Brendan Rodgers | Rejoins Celtic on 3 year deal

fecking hell..... Brendon Rogers being considered as an option??? you lot are having a laugh

He is obviously a brilliant coach. I personally think Ole is making sensible decisions and despite having deficiencies he could end up being the best fit for us but name a team that Brendan has not improved.
 
He is a good coach no doubt but he was at the helm when Liverpool bottled the title and when Leicester bottled top four, so these question marks remain.

Liverpool had 1 top class player at the time and Leicester should be a mile away from the top for. How much does he have to make a team over perform?
 
Rodgers, like Poch, has proven that he too can not win the league.

Do you think Bruno isn't good enough for United? Or Tevez?
Tevez?? Yes of course Bruno. However my point is Maguire as a big money signing for $80 m should be gold dust not even a gamble. Rogers has let’s say always had to trade in the lower end of the market. He makes players better which is something Ole doesn’t do. Would be interesting to see there profit/ loss in the transfer market. Also if we only employ people who have won a league title, there would be very slim pickings. Rogers won the league in Scotland which granted is lesser but to do I think 6/7 in a row is some what good
 
They did but they had to move on.

You lot can stay away as well, if for some reason you don't like the manager who has you second in the table, there is plenty of unemployed to chose from.

You won’t hold on to him for long, at some point he will want to do better.
 
Rodgers is a better coach than Solskjaer there's no PHD / Doctorate degree needed to perceive such a basic assessment.

The way things are going in terms of Ole's development he's still lacking in all the fundamentals a good coach exceeds in. This will catch us up because 1. The league is full of very good coaches and 2. The players cannot do it on their own.

Everyone gave Ole praise for Rashford's / Greenwood's form last season then Ole deserves criticism for their lackluster form heading into this campaign along with Martial's inconsistencies. The fact we are relying on one player to have any sustainability in winning games is ridiculous. Whenever you hear that a team is make or break regarding one individual it usually is an earmark of woeful team cohesion influenced by management. Rodgers is getting the best out of what I'd say is above average players. He's managed to raise his players game something the likes of Klopp / SAF have been very proficient in.

I'm not saying Ole should be sacked but I don't see how the club has anything to build from regarding the transition from top 4 to contending for the league in the immediate future. We have a manager who one week concedes we are out of a title race than a few days later says we aren't settling for second. Fans need to call Ole out on his nonsense from time to time, he's getting far to much of an easy ride with the areas that he's deserved scrutiny for.
 
Liverpool had 1 top class player at the time and Leicester should be a mile away from the top for. How much does he have to make a team over perform?

Why people think this is not Brendan Rodgers fault is confusing.

His transfers were diabolical at Liverpool.

Utter trash.
 
Fabio BoriniRoma£10,400,00013 July 2012
Joe AllenSwansea City£15,000,00010 August 2012
Oussama AssaidiHeerenveen£3,000,00017 August 2012
Nuri SahinReal MadridOn Loan25 August 2012
Samed YesilBayer Leverkusen£1,000,00030 August 2012
Daniel SturridgeChelsea£12,000,0002 January 2013
Philippe CoutinhoInter Milan£8,500,00030 January 2013
Luis AlbertoSevilla£6,800,00022 June 2013
Iago AspasCelta Vigo£7,000,00023 June 2013
Simon MignoletSunderland£9,000,00025 June 2013
Kolo TouréFree TransferFree2 July 2013
Aly CissokhoValenciaOn Loan20 August 2013
Mamadou SakhoParis St Germain£15,000,0002 September 2013
Tiago IloriSporting Lisbon£3,500,000 *2 September 2013
Victor MosesChelseaOn Loan2 September 2013
Rickie LambertSouthampton£4,500,0002 June 2014
Adam LallanaSouthampton£25,000,000 *1 July 2014
Emre CanBayer Leverkusen£9,750,0003 July 2014
Kevin StewartFree TransferFree3 July 2014
Lazar MarkovicBenfica£19,800,00015 July 2014
Dejan LovrenSouthampton£20,000,000 *27 July 2014
Divock OrigiLille£9,800,000 *29 July 2014
Javier ManquilloAtletico MadridOn Loan6 August 2014
Alberto MorenoSevilla£12,000,000 *16 August 2014
Mario BalotelliAC Milan£16,000,00025 August 2014
Joe GomezCharlton Athletic£6,000,000 *20 June 2015
Adam BogdanFree TransferFree1 July 2015
Danny IngsFree Transfer£8,000,000 *1 July 2015
James MilnerFree TransferFree1 July 2015
Nathaniel ClyneSouthampton£12,500,0001 July 2015
Roberto FirminoTSG 1899 Hoffenheim£29,000,000 *6 July 2015
Christian BentekeAston Villa£32,500,00022 July 2015
Allan Rodrigues de SouzaInternacional£500,0002
 
Around £91 million overall spend. From where they were and to have them challenging not bad. However that was then, this is now. Better than then. No doubt a top coach, like has been stated, Sir Matt has affiliation to bin dippers. If we never had him, god only knows what our history would be
 
Rodgers, like Poch, has proven that he too can not win the league.

Do you think Bruno isn't good enough for United? Or Tevez?
That is nonsense... Rodgers has been with two unfancied Premier League teams and got them challenging against all odds. By all rights, Leicester should be 6th at best. Without doubt, Rodgers has the potential to win the league and probably the most drive to do so.

Again look at what he did in Scotland. He didn't just win a couple of trophies, he won EVERYTHING for years. And look at Celtic now... Not actually that easy eh!
 
The fact is, apart from Pep, Rogers is the only proven coach who has performed well in the premier league. Poch had a good season at Spurs when they reached champions league final. However following season was poor and hasn’t really done anything else in the long term, prior. All others mentioned are built up by the press as up and coming managers but managing united is a different beast. Ole is not the answer, continues to frustrate the majority and his style of playing on the break against the so called bigger teams, unable to break down teams who park the bus and a team who plays with a lack of intensity, over reliant on players to create that special moment to rescue us or indeed win leads me to believe as a coach he has serious shortcomings. We have spent as much as anyone, yet his big money signings such as Maguire really are not good enough for United. Rogers all the way for me.
I could not agree more and cannot understand the small-minded approach that he 'has not won the league' or 'he worked for Liverpool'. These are irrelevant when you look at the bigger picture. If we waited for 'someone who had won the league', we would have a choice of Pep (excellent but not going to happen), Klopp (not convinced about him long term), Jose (ahem).

Rodgers appears to have the biggest growth potential, desire, skill and best attitude for us. It is so glaringly obvious he is our best option, but sadly most fans somehow cannot see it.

Again, I have not seen any poster name a candidate that ticks as many boxes as Rodgers....
 
That is nonsense... Rodgers has been with two unfancied Premier League teams and got them challenging against all odds. By all rights, Leicester should be 6th at best. Without doubt, Rodgers has the potential to win the league and probably the most drive to do so.

Again look at what he did in Scotland. He didn't just win a couple of trophies, he won EVERYTHING for years. And look at Celtic now... Not actually that easy eh!
Celtic had won the league five times in a row when he joined them, so they weren't exactly underdogs. He did a great job there and has at Leicester too- I've actually warmed to him and his teams play good football. I'm just saying it's no banker that he would be successful at OT, as two Champions League winning managers who've won way more than he has have shown.
 
Now Rodgers has decided to start beating Liverpool, what's not to like? Yes he's a plonker, but he failed to win Liverpool the title, that's another positive.

It'll never happen, I'm not really suggesting he takes over from Ole, but to still be turning your nose up at him is strange really, and I'm not sure how much of it is actually based on football it self.
 
Celtic had won the league five times in a row when he joined them, so they weren't exactly underdogs. He did a great job there and has at Leicester too- I've actually warmed to him and his teams play good football. I'm just saying it's no banker that he would be successful at OT, as two Champions League winning managers who've won way more than he has have shown.

If you compare the career trajectory of our “two Championship League winning managers” with Rogers you’d have to admit he looks like a better prospect than either of them did at the time we hired them (a trajectory that has continued with their careers after United)
 
If you compare the career trajectory of our “two Championship League winning managers” with Rogers you’d have to admit he looks like a better prospect than either of them did at the time we hired them (a trajectory that has continued with their careers after United)
Yeah, you'd obviously take his football over LVG's any day. I think my argument had gotten stuck in a furrow, much like our current team.
 
Still ridiculously underrated on here. I think he made some poor choices at Liverpool, but let's not forget he was like 39 when he took the gig. I think he's learned a-lot since then and has toned down the gobshite philosopher persona.

He needed to massively improve how he organises a team defensively and for me, he's done that. They are better than us in that department this season in 6th and are 4th for goals scored.

No idea why his transfers at Liverpool are being brought up again? He signed some absolute shite but made some good buys in Clyne, Firmino, Coutinho, Gomez, Lallana, Sturridge and Milner. Ings could have been good too if not for the injuries and Allen and Can were ok for them. Of course there were the horror shows like Benteke, Markovic and Mignolet. His signings at Leicester have generally been very good too.

He's clearly a talented manager and I think he'll get a chance at another big club after Leicester. The stauch 'Ole in' crowd calling him 'average' while lauding Ole are showing a staggering lack of self awareness.
 
Now Rodgers has decided to start beating Liverpool, what's not to like? Yes he's a plonker, but he failed to win Liverpool the title, that's another positive.

It'll never happen, I'm not really suggesting he takes over from Ole, but to still be turning your nose up at him is strange really, and I'm not sure how much of it is actually based on football it self.

Not sure why it would never happen. Rodgers would jump at the chance to join us; he has already shown he won't hesitate by leaving Celtic midseason to join Leicester.

We are far from being securely in the top four, so Solskjaer's sacking is still a very real possibility. I doubt we would dismiss Rodgers just because he managed Liverpool. In fact, this summer could be a prime time to get him.

Have to agree with the bolded, though. People are still bringing up him not winning the league with Liverpool, but Suarez's ridiculous form provided such a hugely unexpected boost. They finished sixth the season before.

Squad in title challenge season (Bolded were Rodger's additions):
Mignolet
Johnson
Skrtel
Agger
Lucas
Gerrard
Henderson
Coutinho
Sterling

Suarez
Sturridge

People talk about his signings, but they weren't all that bad:
Coutinho (sold for £130m)
Sturridge (good player back then)
Emre Can is a good player
Lovren would have been a decent squad player (probably wished they had kept him this season)
Firmino (played a major part in their success)
Milner (good squad player)
Ings (Very good striker - injuries were unfortunate)
He also brought through Sterling (sold for £57m).

It actually isn't that bad.

Also, remember they lost Suarez almost straight after his best season and Sterling the season after that. Sturridge became a crock. Gerrard was almost done. It wasn't all that surprising their position came crashing back down afterwards.
 
Last edited:
Liverpool had 1 top class player at the time and Leicester should be a mile away from the top for. How much does he have to make a team over perform?

Why should they be a mile away from top four? Their strongest 11 gives anyone a game and is very strong. They might not get top four because of lack of squad depth but to say they should be a mile away from top four is underestimating them.
 
Celtic had won the league five times in a row when he joined them, so they weren't exactly underdogs. He did a great job there and has at Leicester too- I've actually warmed to him and his teams play good football. I'm just saying it's no banker that he would be successful at OT, as two Champions League winning managers who've won way more than he has have shown.
Yes but no-one is ever a banker at any club. Mourinho and Van Gaal were already past it and cannot be compared with Rodgers. He was even excellent way back at Swansea. It is an easy an lazy argument to say that Celtic had won previously... yes they had but look more closely at what he did there. Also he has no right having Leicester so high up the table (and Liverpool a few years ago, who also had no right almost winning with their team).

His premier league experience, drive, commitment and track record of winning trophies all mean he is by far the best candidate for our club. Also he is on an 'upwards trajectory', unlike most managers we seem to appoint.
 
I agree. In fact, which manager would you appoint over him in place of Ole? Yes Pep, but that won't happen. I honesty think he ticks all our boxes otherwise and can't think of anyone better (and that includes abroad, who although superficially desirable, have no premier league experience and / or experience of winning trophies). Hopefully our board are keeping a close eye on him.

Ancelotti is the only other manager I’d consider. He would have us more defensively organized but would still have us scoring goals.
 
Yes but no-one is ever a banker at any club. Mourinho and Van Gaal were already past it and cannot be compared with Rodgers. He was even excellent way back at Swansea. It is an easy an lazy argument to say that Celtic had won previously... yes they had but look more closely at what he did there. Also he has no right having Leicester so high up the table (and Liverpool a few years ago, who also had no right almost winning with their team).

His premier league experience, drive, commitment and track record of winning trophies all mean he is by far the best candidate for our club. Also he is on an 'upwards trajectory', unlike most managers we seem to appoint.
He's doing a great job at Leicester, who were more or less a top six team when he took over, as I've said, but he is also benefiting from the likes of Chelsea and Arsenal in transition, Spurs fecking up and Liverpool have a dip. I do likely still harbour some prejudices about his Liverpool past and how they fecked that season up, plus some of the more clownish aspects of his at times David Brent-like persona.
 
Tevez?? Yes of course Bruno. However my point is Maguire as a big money signing for $80 m should be gold dust not even a gamble. Rogers has let’s say always had to trade in the lower end of the market. He makes players better which is something Ole doesn’t do. Would be interesting to see there profit/ loss in the transfer market. Also if we only employ people who have won a league title, there would be very slim pickings. Rogers won the league in Scotland which granted is lesser but to do I think 6/7 in a row is some what good
Tevez:lol: I was very tired, I meant Cavani!

Some players have clearly improved under Ole, eg Shaw, McTominay and Greenwood. I'm sure haters and will say that's in spite of Ole or cos they're young, while Ole backers will give him some credit. Who knows.
It also depends on what you class as a 'proven premier league manager'. He has massive overachievement and a huge choke on his CV. Moyes also had overachievement on his too.
 
He's doing a great job at Leicester, who were more or less a top six team when he took over, as I've said, but he is also benefiting from the likes of Chelsea and Arsenal in transition, Spurs fecking up and Liverpool have a dip. I do likely still harbour some prejudices about his Liverpool past and how they fecked that season up, plus some of the more clownish aspects of his at times David Brent-like persona.
They weren't a top six side when he took over ,they more like mid table. They finished 12th and 9th in the seasons before he took over. Since then they finished 9th(he took over end of Feb that season),5th and now are 3rd level on points with us which is a clear inarguable improvement since he's been in charge. That sort of improvement is impressive enough to make yu think that he can make that next step up.
 
Why should they be a mile away from top four? Their strongest 11 gives anyone a game and is very strong. They might not get top four because of lack of squad depth but to say they should be a mile away from top four is underestimating them.

I personally think that you rate their first 11 as a lot better than it actually is due to Rodgers making them play a lot better than the sum of their parts. Something he often has done.

Everton have a better first 11 and a very good manager for example. Spurs also.
 
One of my least favorite people in football. he is so punch able it is untrue...... Yet if I was Woodward I would go all out to get him.

I really do think he is a fantastic coach.
 
We definitely need to get him in after Ole I think. Makes so much sense.
 
I personally think that you rate their first 11 as a lot better than it actually is due to Rodgers making them play a lot better than the sum of their parts. Something he often has done.

Everton have a better first 11 and a very good manager for example. Spurs also.
I personally think that you rate their first 11 as a lot better than it actually is due to Rodgers making them play a lot better than the sum of their parts. Something he often has done.

Everton have a better first 11 and a very good manager for example. Spurs also.

1 Kasper
2 Ricardo
3 Soyuncu/Evans
4 Fofana
5 Castagne/Justin
6 Ndidi
7 Albrighton
8 Tielemans/Praet
9 Barnes
10 Maddison
11 Vardy

Out of interest which Everton players do you rate better over ours?
 
Ancelotti is the only other manager I’d consider. He would have us more defensively organized but would still have us scoring goals.
I do have to agree, but Ancelotti has always underperformed domestically. But yes I agree. For me Rodgers has no flaws in terms of his suitability.
 
He's doing a great job at Leicester, who were more or less a top six team when he took over, as I've said, but he is also benefiting from the likes of Chelsea and Arsenal in transition, Spurs fecking up and Liverpool have a dip. I do likely still harbour some prejudices about his Liverpool past and how they fecked that season up, plus some of the more clownish aspects of his at times David Brent-like persona.
Rodgers is the real deal. He came mightily close with Liverpool (who did not have any right to be close to winning the league at that stage) and has overperformed everywhere. He doesn't really have a David Brent-like persona at all, certainly not now. It is very small minded to overlook such a talented manager for these things. He is right under our noses, yet most fans can't see it because of snobbery.

I have yet to hear a valid suggestion of a better candidate than Rodgers based on all aspects.
 
Rodgers is a decent coach but he will be a disastrous of an appointment. Never convinced he can handle the pressure of managing a top club and for all his good work the man bottles big games. I know injuries and all but the way his side crumbled last season was not good. Even his SF knock out against Villa last season in League cup was shocking. Also, his side rarely plays some dominating football like some think. Whenever he is paired with a big side, his sides play will an inferiority complex.

I just don't think he will be the man to take us forward. If we hire him, I will back him and support him but I will always have my doubts and would stay away from him.
 
I personally think that you rate their first 11 as a lot better than it actually is due to Rodgers making them play a lot better than the sum of their parts. Something he often has done.

Everton have a better first 11 and a very good manager for example. Spurs also.
I think most fans of the clubs in the top ten down to Arsenal would fancy their one to eleven against Leicester’s rightly or wrongly. I’d have Leicester’s toward the bottom end of that group. Rodgers has done a brilliant job, as he has everywhere since taking over at Swansea
 
Rodgers is a decent coach but he will be a disastrous of an appointment. Never convinced he can handle the pressure of managing a top club and for all his good work the man bottles big games. I know injuries and all but the way his side crumbled last season was not good. Even his SF knock out against Villa last season in League cup was shocking. Also, his side rarely plays some dominating football like some think. Whenever he is paired with a big side, his sides play will an inferiority complex.

I just don't think he will be the man to take us forward. If we hire him, I will back him and support him but I will always have my doubts and would stay away from him.

We had 43 chances against Villa over the 2 legs, you cannot blame Rodgers for that , I was at both games, we had no luck.

As for dominating games, we have beaten Liverpool, Man City , Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal this season, you play to your strengths , it’s not really wise to go toe to toe with Man City and Liverpool, as bad as Liverpool have been they’re still a very good side.

Against Man City, I thought we was excellent, defended deep and they struggled to break us down, we then hit them on the counter.

Spurs and Chelsea we was the better side, against Man Utd we had more of the ball, you had the better chances.

You don’t have to win games by being dominant, we won the league with very little possession.
 
  • Like
Reactions: golden_blunder
He is a good coach no doubt. I am surprised by the hate he gets for managing Liverpool
Sir Matt was at Liverpool too.
 
If we want to be a true force again we need someone better, in my opinion.

I have no idea who that is, but I don't think Rodgers will reach the levels Klopp and Pep have.
 
Hes a good coach and i would bet if he had taken over when Ole did being allowed to buy his own players like Ole, we would be better overall as a team and maybe would have won a cup at least. 3 semis we lost in last year and Rodgers is being called a bottle job. :rolleyes:
 
He is a good coach no doubt. I am surprised by the hate he gets for managing Liverpool
Sir Matt was at Liverpool too.
It’s partly Liverpool and largely because he’s a manager who’s success rate is on par with Ole with less spend and a less fancied club. A lot of the Ole fanboys are insecure about this. This is why they bump this thread whenever Leicester lose a game and start slagging him off. See the same for Nagelsman, Hassenhutl, basically any manager capable of playing good football with smaller budget and smaller club.
 
I'm still amazed grown up people use a term fanboy.

It's from Pochettino, Rose and Tuchel to Rodgers just cause he's doing a good job at Leicester. I remember when even a guy from Bournemouth was mentioned.