A people's Revolution

Its Egypt fault for not rising up sooner. As for the money, I don't think the Egyptian people deserve a cent of it in fairness but neither here nor there.


I hope hosni buys united fecking a we will be able to buy messi and ronaldo

That's a pretty odd post.
 
You don't seem to grasp the concepts of diplomacy and strategic communications. Obama quite rightly didn't come out in support of a Revolution in Egypt in the early days of the protests because Egypt, for better or worse is an ally. He then quite rightly began to gradually incorporate the ideals of what the protesters were seeking in his talking points, because at the end of the day, what the protesters want wasn't divergent from US ideals of Democracy. He didn't have the luxury of spastically siding with the protesters in the opening days because had the protests fizzled out, the US would have completely alienated the Egyptian Government. Conversely, had he continued to deny the aspirations of the protesters to the bitter end, he would have alienated the US from any future Egyptian Government. He was right to gradually transition the arc of his message from cautiously pro-Mubarak in the beginning to pro-the will of the people in the end. He was nearly flawless in this regard.

There's not much I disagree with there, Obama was excellently pragmatic in his approach and played a diplomatic master stroke throughout this whole lengthy episode.

But:

what the protesters want wasn't divergent from US ideals of Democracy.

I have to take exception with this. The people of the US truly do believe in the values of democracy, thats why so many of them were supportive of the protester's demands. The government on the other hand only believe in it in principle, not in practise. The truth is, this is a huge setback for the United States government since the last thing the corporate-run US government had wanted was a democratic Egypt; Frank Wisner's comments were perfectly representative of the State Department's stance even if you had dear Hillary say otherwise.

To his employers Obama was brilliant in dealing with the whole thing - he privately supported a tyrant that served US government interests, and when it was clear Mubarak was finished he publically jumped ship and holstered the flag of the free, democratic world. It was diplomatically sound but horribly dishonest.
 
How long until we have an Algeria thread, protests getting heavier there.
 
Good point I forgot this thread's initial coverage. Algeria or Yemen. Conflicting reports on how many are out, but thousands are out for the banned protest 1000 detained including 5 mps, riot police out in full force.
 
HR - that article is interesting because, all the talk has been how Gates and US Army Chief have a 15-20 year old relationship with Tantawi, and that he's spent a lot of time in the US, and with US military figures.

So go figure....
 
Algeria in the several thousands, Yemen picking up quite heavily too. Reports of unrest in other ME countries too.

This thread could end up being the 10k challenge part 3.
 
I want to read the last 3-5 pages and reply and comment to everyone and thank everyone..but i can't focus.. too many thoughts ..too many emotions..too many things to do.


As a start..thank you all :)
 
There's nothing the US had to do other than make statements about the events, just as other leaders did. The only thing that was to be avoided was the potential chaos of changing Governments, which looks to have been avoided until now. The US, therefore, have come out of this quite tidily. Next stop, Iran.

I can't believe people can be so forgetful. It was Joe Biden who said Mubarak isn't a dictator. Tell that to the Egyptians.

By sidelining Mubarak, Obama has pretty much told the rest of the Middle East and all its allies that he won't be able to help them if protests are ignited in their own state. This, along with the horrendous comments made by US diplomats in the Wikileaks cables, have pushed back diplomacy channels over 50 years.

This may very well be one of the worst blunders in US diplomatic history.

Also, this will never happen in Iran because you forget three important issues. Firstly, the army is WITH the government not the protesters. Secondly, there are just as many people who support the government as there are who oppose it. Thirdly, as much as you'd like to think otherwise, Ahmadinejad is not Mubarak.
 
Tunisia and Egypt are fairly homegeneous and socially stable countries so revolution there can happen smoothly - Yemen and Algeria on the otherhand wouldn't be able to do so and would become very ugly indeed, Yemen especially.
 
Please tell Sharistani and Maliki to sort their shit out, I got shares in Kurdish oil.

Then you're fine, the Kurdish region is more or less economically autonomous. Maliki and his cronies have nothing to do with it, in fact the great man halved his $10million a month salary as an act of good will. What a guy.
 
I can't believe people can be so forgetful. It was Joe Biden who said Mubarak isn't a dictator. Tell that to the Egyptians.

By sidelining Mubarak, Obama has pretty much told the rest of the Middle East and all its allies that he won't be able to help them if protests are ignited in their own state. This, along with the horrendous comments made by US diplomats in the Wikileaks cables, have pushed back diplomacy channels over 50 years.

This may very well be one of the worst blunders in US diplomatic history.

Also, this will never happen in Iran because you forget three important issues. Firstly, the army is WITH the government not the protesters. Secondly, there are just as many people who support the government as there are who oppose it. Thirdly, as much as you'd like to think otherwise, Ahmadinejad is not Mubarak.

I know the protesters would be dead by now.
 
I can't believe people can be so forgetful. It was Joe Biden who said Mubarak isn't a dictator. Tell that to the Egyptians.

By sidelining Mubarak, Obama has pretty much told the rest of the Middle East and all its allies that he won't be able to help them if protests are ignited in their own state. This, along with the horrendous comments made by US diplomats in the Wikileaks cables, have pushed back diplomacy channels over 50 years.

This may very well be one of the worst blunders in US diplomatic history.

Also, this will never happen in Iran because you forget three important issues. Firstly, the army is WITH the government not the protesters. Secondly, there are just as many people who support the government as there are who oppose it. Thirdly, as much as you'd like to think otherwise, Ahmadinejad is not Mubarak.

Iran and other countries that lack stable Democratic systems will inevitably all collapse. At the end of the day people want greater freedom, and dictatorships, which Iran still is, don't stand a chance in stopping it. Khamanai, Ahmadinejad, and their thugs got away with it a couple of summers ago, but it won't be as simple as simply killing and arresting demonstrators the next time, especially after Egypt, Facebook, and with the world watching. A month ago, no one thought it possible for Egypt to flip. Theocracies, Monarchies, and otherwise authoritarian regimes will have to begin serious internal reforms or else risk going the way of Mubarak.
 
Have fun, I'll be in Iraq in the next month or so too :D

excellent2.jpg
 
Iran and other countries that lack stable Democratic systems will inevitably all collapse. At the end of the day people want greater freedom, and dictatorships, which Iran still is, don't stand a chance in stopping it. Khamanai, Ahmadinejad, and their thugs got away with it a couple of summers ago, but it won't be as simple as simply killing and arresting demonstrators the next time, especially after Egypt, Facebook, and with the world watching. A month ago, no one thought it possible for Egypt to flip. Theocracies, Monarchies, and otherwise authoritarian regimes will have to begin serious internal reforms or else risk going the way of Mubarak.

...and the annual post of Raoul's comes to pass.


The one post that doesn't appear to be a talking-point or utter nonsense.



Stamp_of_Approval.jpg
 
...and the annual post of Raoul's comes to pass.


The one post that doesn't appear to be a talking-point or utter nonsense.



Stamp_of_Approval.jpg

Very nice of you Rob. Although its likely down to a breakthrough on your part, not mine.
 
Call me a pessimist, but I don't think the Egyptian revolution is anywhere near over, in fact this could have been a master stroke by the US and certain army officials.

I have a bad feeling about this..
 
Call me a pessimist, but I don't think the Egyptian revolution is anywhere near over, in fact this could have been a master stroke by the US and certain army officials.

I have a bad feeling about this..

Still a long way to go before elections. Its up to the military to keep the peace between now and then.
 
Call me a pessimist, but I don't think the Egyptian revolution is anywhere near over, in fact this could have been a master stroke by the US and certain army officials.

I have a bad feeling about this..

I can't see the army taking the risk.

Can you imagine the anger of the people if there's no handover of power within a certain time-scale?
 
Call me a pessimist, but I don't think the Egyptian revolution is anywhere near over, in fact this could have been a master stroke by the US and certain army officials.

I have a bad feeling about this..

nah.. i'll call you a paranoid ;)
 

What are they going to do? Call elections tomorrow? It's going to take an extended amount of time to institute the reforms necessary to meet public demands, allow for the formation of a political system and parties, and then finally allowing for a campaign/elections process that is free and fair. This stuff doesn't happen over night and the military is right to take its time.

Having elections in September looks like a stretch to me right now. There has to be enough time for the political system and culture to be changed before you can hold an election. The biggest criticism is that there isn't a civilian presence in the governing body, which is pretty important. The timetable isn't much of an issue.
 
I think the least they could have done is given the people an explicit promise that there will be an election in September when one's due. I don't think it's unrealistic that the political infrastructure can be put in place, particularly as the UN is very keen to help out.
 
Yeah, I know.. you're perception is locked onto a State Dept. press release like a steel-trap.;)

My views are based on common sense and are mine alone, and based on professional observations of being in the middle east for most of the past decade.
 
I think the least they could have done is given the people an explicit promise that there will be an election in September when one's due. I don't think it's unrealistic that the political infrastructure can be put in place, particularly as the UN is very keen to help out.

Out of interest, how many UN member states are in fact democracies?
 
Iran's the one I really want to fall (as well as Saudi obviously). I know a number of Iranian ex-pats and they all say their country could be great if they got rid of the theocracy. I can see Iran being a lot more bloody than Egypt and Tunisia though...
 
Iran's a difficult one though - a large proportion of the population are loyal to the regime, and that includes much of the military too. You're right in thinking it could turn into a bloodbath.

No reason why they shouldn't give a peaceful protest in numbers a go, just as the Egyptians had more or less done.