gza the genius
Full Member
With Welbeck out for the Swansea game I would have Berba starting with Rooney, I highly doubt we'll see this though.
Oh how we could have used him to run up the score against weak teams this season. Look at the fecking goal difference!
I've never been quite sure how to take him.
He got 20 goals last season, but 14 of them were in 4 games, which sort of sums him up for me.
Oh how we could have used him to run up the score against weak teams this season. Look at the fecking goal difference!
So why didn't we? If it's down to Fergie's petulance, it could have cost us the title.
You really love the Berbs don't you!
I think that other factors cost us the title (assuming that we have lost it!) but I agree in that the Berbs is more likely to put the ball in the back on the net against the Wigan's and QPR's of this world than Welbeck.
Also the guy is on 80k a week and doing nothing, that can't be considered as 'value', more of a shameful waste.
Yes I really do love him, although I have to admit that it's not exactly worked out how I initially thought it would. Tbh I think he's been treated shamefully. I realise that Rooney and Welbeck are the way forward ( copyright Redcafe ) but to think he's not even been on the bench is ridiculous for a player like that. We've laboured to quite a few wins, and I can't believe a mercurial player like Berbatov wouldn't have at least created chances in some matches this season.
Our attack certainly was faultless against Wigan wasn't it?back at you
He and fergie have clearly had a falling out.
You dont just get dropped like that because you are out of form.
He and fergie have clearly had a falling out.
You dont just get dropped like that because you are out of form.
If he and Fergie have had a falling out, it means he's putting his own pique before the good of the team then
I just can't imagine Berbatov being active enough to have a falling out with Fergie. He's never seemed the type to talk back to the manager, and all his interviews have suggested a very professional player.
I think Fergie just wanted to prove he could beat City without spending. And in his head, that meant using a youth player (Welbeck) and a bargain player (Chicarito) ahead of our record signing. I literally can't come up with another reason.
Because Berbatov, today, is better than both of the youngsters. And Fergie was so willing to rely on older, more experienced heads like Park, Giggs and Scholes - but not the Berbs.
I know it's not your data but that seems like weak analysis to me. A quick look at the table he made on RoM shows a lot of errors. To get the 48% it seems like he's counted one less start for Berba and used two goals he scored from the bench last season, one of which came in the community shield, something he doesn't appear to count for any of our other strikers. I assume it's meant to be league only analysis too, otherwise the figures show Berba scored in 31% of his starts last season.Scott the Red @R_o_M
Last season, Berbatov scored in 48% of the games that he started. This was a better rate than 13 of the other 18 top scorers.
Scott the Red @R_o_M
Also, Carlos Tevez never scored in as many different games for us as Berba did last season.
Reading comprehension problem?That's not my point. Of course the attack is not faultless, but he's not being sold because our attack is soo good that we can do without him(like you implied through silly sarcasm), he's being sold because he just doesn't fit United's system.
Silly sarcasm seems to be the only to get through sometimes - and I didn't seem to have any problem with reading comprehension in any of the O or A levels I managed to pass.
My point is that our brilliant attack ( occasionally ) could well have been assisted by Berbatov. Is it that difficult to understand? Yet he wasn't even on the bench
Good for you
Well the manager, who knows waay better than you do and isn't speaking from blind fanboy/fangirlism obviously thinks the number of games or situations where he'll come in handy isn't worth keeping him with Welbeck and Hernandez in the team, it's something you'll have to learn to deal with. Maybe more silly sarcasm will help you with that?
Personally don't see how Rooney on the left with Nani/Valencia wide right wouldn't have accomodated for Berbatov occupying the creative role behind Welbeck's pace or Hernandez's predatory instinct. Especially against weaker opposition - might have produced a few more goals and points along the way. Rooney is better in that creative hole but I'm sure with a player like Berbatov spraying passes around Rooney could perform on the left. Not advocating this for all matches but surely against sides that would prefer to play nine men behind the ball.
We have a very good points total and goals scored. Why wouldbyoubstick rooney on the left?
What a foolish post.
Because Rooney has never played on the left flank to accomodate a player...
As I stated, against certain opposition not all. It was simply a response to how in fact Berbatov-Rooney could work together.
But I bow to your stupendous opinion. Probably makes you feel a bigger man to post.
Yes he accommodated Ronaldo. I think that is fair enough.
What about Valencia, young and nani? It would mean 2 of them miss out as well
The manager is also prone to the occasional error in judgement. If he'd not been so bloody greedy in wanting the siring rights for that damned horse he was given, we'd probably not have been sold to the Glazers - so don't tell me he's perfect!
Remind me again why I'm supposed to think you don't have a comprehension problem?Kindly point out where I said Fergie's perfect and makes no mistakes. Of course makes mistakes, but does he know waaay better than EricaNo7 a user on the internet who's posts on Berbatov always seems to be tinged with fangirl bias? I think he does and by his judgement(and what we can see), he feels Berbatov doesn't work with the team.
There was no falling out and Welbeck and Hernandez playing because they are the future may be somewhat true, but the real reason why Berbatov hasn't played very often is because of Wayne Rooney.
Rooney and Berbatov like to play and are best when playing behind a striker. Obviously, Rooney is better because of the work he puts in when we are off the ball and has somewhat masked our midfield problems. We need to start Rooney in every game we can and we have, and Berbatov has made limited appearances for us because of it. They both want to do the same thing and as a result, they haven't formed a very good partnership. This season they've only played together as a front 2 partnership against Newcastle. The few starts Berba has managed, was when Rooney was out of the side completely or on the bench.
if Berbs dosn't fit in with Rooney, then why was he bought? It wouldn't be the first time Fergie has misjudged a player's place in the team. He may be the gretatest of all time but still not perfect
It's absolute bollox about berbatov not working off the ball because it has been shown he does as much if not more than other players playing regularly. Rooney is a protected species on here but some of his passing has been appalling recently. It just defies logic that Berbatov would have less to contribute than Fergie has allowed.
Having said that, I don't think it's a good idea to suddenly bring him in when he knows he's out of the door in a couple of weeks.
When he first came, Rooney wouldn't have exactly been viewed as a partner for him. Ronaldo was in the team as well which obviously changed the complexion of things. I don't think Fergie would have envisaged us planning to sell Ronaldo at the end of that season. Where he was supposed to fit into the team, I don't know. You'd have to ask the boss that. He obviously had some sort of plan for him, but it obviously never really worked out in the end.
I'm split as to what my overall thoughts are about the Berbatov transfer. He was important last season and a large part of why we actually won the title, however I still think that, on reflection, the money we spent on him may have been more useful if it was put to signing a central midfielder, which we could've done with then and more evidently need now. Still, I won't complain as he's done some really good things for us in his time here.
still a bit mystifying that he isn't deemed to be worthy of a part of the effort by Fergie, when there have been games when he would've clearly helped. Perhaps he hasn't lived up to the highest expectations but some of that has been out of his control.
It's bewildering because not only was he arguably our best forward last year, he has also performed well in the limited chances he's been afforded this season.