- Joined
- May 16, 2012
- Messages
- 210
I would agree that some City fans have a certain sense of paranoia. I think there is a degree of justification for this based on the media's desire to appeal to as much of the public as possible (that being Man Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal fans..etc). BT Sport's abysmal coverage of City in the Champions League being a good example but recent articles in the Mirror and Mail being more contemporary examples. Whether the feeling will change, who knows but when your club is often portrayed as some sort of malign outsider then it seems natural to assume the role of an outsider.
Your final sentence is truly preposterous. Every single City fan is completely comfortable in their skin and quite happy with their club's history.
When BT shelled out for the CL rights i'm sure they expected the big clubs to be in it more often than not.
It's like paying big money to see some Hollywood star perform on the West End. On taking your seat there is an announcement that the star will not be performing & his part will be played by the under-study. You are still seeing the show but it's lost some of it's sparkle.
It's come as a huge disappointment to them to see teams like City, Spurs, & Leicester to a lesser extent, gaining entry. Spurs have had awful results but at least have sold out Wembley. In the case of leicester, the fairytale was allowed to go on a little further. City have been a total embarrassment though. Results have been garbage & most home games played out in a half empty stadium. BT did their part in shelling out the cash. You didn't give them value for money though.
You seem to be confused in regards History & Existing. City have existed for many years. Apart from the odd year here & there you go down as a complete failures in the history books. If you don't get it, this is not the kind of history you want to be known for.