
Still wishing and hoping eh Paul?
Dream on, we are leaving, if that means no deal then that's what it is, but when Theresa shows them the money it will turn the EU heads, they can't help it!
PS. Sorry been out of contact for a while, bet you've missed me? When we last exchange posts you were trying to tell me how influential MEP's were and the British MEP's let the side down, or something in that vein. The Commissioners make the policies, the MEPS are something like our Lords they can approve or send back for amendments, but they are not the policy makers.. thought you would have known that?![]()
It is odd- you'd think that they'd they cover off that scenario, at least in the annex, but can't find anything. From p247 it goes on about difficulties in making assumptions round the cost of the divorce bill, how long we continue to contribute and the additional costs we take on, eg massively expanding HMRC staff.Going by pages around 37 and 38 I think it's assuming the deep and special partnership (although I haven't read it all yet) with some agreement with the EU.
I would have thought if WTO and losing passport rights were anticipated they would be highlighted in red unless of course that sort of comment was suppressed by the government.
From what I gather London will remain the premier financial centre in Europe after Brexit.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-london-stays-worlds-top-finance-centre-despite-brexit-2017-9
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/b...inancial-capital-despite-brexit-a8054801.html
@fcbforever
And what of the countries that aren't in the EU, how do they trade?
I said we would be doing well to avoid a recession, in fact it would surprise me if we did. I didn't project those GDP figures, nor am I the decision maker at Goldman Sachs building their new European headquarters in London.
Hammond today said 6th largest![]()
I'm unsure as to how those articles, which are based on the UK still being in the EU, are relevant to what will happen after the UK isn't in the EU anymore?From what I gather London will remain the premier financial centre in Europe after Brexit.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/r-london-stays-worlds-top-finance-centre-despite-brexit-2017-9
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/b...inancial-capital-despite-brexit-a8054801.html
@fcbforever
And what of the countries that aren't in the EU, how do they trade?
Investopedia has us fifth, then India and France. Tbf, you can measure economy size in several different ways, which will throw up different results.To be fair, France and the UK are extremely close. I don't understand why either side always try to make people believe something else.
Edit: And India.
Investopedia has us fifth, then India and France. Tbf, you can measure economy size in several different ways, which will throw up different results.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022415/worlds-top-10-economies.asp
At the end of the day there are reputable economists on both sides of this argument and my explanation is hardly a definitive explanation of what fiscal union entails anyway. So yeah, I can live with you disagreeing with me.
In case you have missed it, Goldman is moving substantial parts of their business to Frankfurt and Paris. Including their European headquarter.
I'm unsure as to how those articles, which are based on the UK still being in the EU, are relevant to what will happen after the UK isn't in the EU anymore?
I suspect London will remain the world's biggest financial center for quite some time after Brexit, because, well, it's huge, but over time things are definitely going to change, slowly but surely. We probably won't see anyone overtake London, moreso the growth will spread in the likes of Paris, Frankfurt and to a lesser extent Amsterdam, Dublin, etc. as London shrinks.
To be fair, France and the UK are extremely close. I don't understand why either side always try to make people believe something else.
Edit: And India.
Investopedia has us fifth, then India and France. Tbf, you can measure economy size in several different ways, which will throw up different results.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022415/worlds-top-10-economies.asp
GDP per head is the more important figure anyway, as far as how prosperous or otherwise people are. I'd rather the lifestyle of the average Swiss than that of an Indian or Brazilian any day.
GDP per head is the more important figure anyway, as far as how prosperous or otherwise people are. I'd rather the lifestyle of the average Swiss than that of an Indian or Brazilian any day.
Was going to say, the top one wasn"t me!Agreed. Did @Jippy stole my identity?![]()
I guess more that we risk introducing a physicality through border checks.I still don't understand. Are people genuinely thinking that the problem is with the physicality of the border? The problem is legal, the current borders are invisible but that's because the exact same set of rules are applied on both sides.
Agreed. Did @Jippy stole my identity?![]()
The plagiarising bastard! That's his actual profession tbf.I don't know how he did it, but I've reported him anyway.
New Zealand. Never been there, know very little about the place, but people I know who say they want to wash their hands of the rest of the world and live a quiet life as subsistence farmers always seem to settle on New Zealand.
Surely the latter. I think everyone is still working on the assumption a deal will be reached in the end. WTO rules would surely be much worse, regardless of what Brexiters say. I think even most of them would admit in the short term it will be a fair bit bumpier than these numbers imply. As evidenced by the ones that are also financial advisors telling investors to get their money the hell out of the UK.
To be fair, France and the UK are extremely close. I don't understand why either side always try to make people believe something else.
Edit: And India.
Could have changed mid year. With their rate of growth for China and India can cover small absolute figures in a matter of months.Investopedia has us fifth, then India and France. Tbf, you can measure economy size in several different ways, which will throw up different results.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/022415/worlds-top-10-economies.asp
Not quite. China has a low GDP per capita but if you picked up the richest 60 million people in China they would in all likelihood be richer than the 60 million people in England. When it comes to trade per capita GDP not that important.GDP per head is the more important figure anyway, as far as how prosperous or otherwise people are. I'd rather the lifestyle of the average Swiss than that of an Indian or Brazilian any day.
Not quite. China has a low GDP per capita but if you picked up the richest 60 million people in China they would in all likelihood be richer than the 60 million people in England. When it comes to trade per capita GDP not that important.
Since the ranking of the economies were being discussed in the context of trade, I thought it relevant to point out that averages of large masses matter little.I said lifestyle, not trade per capita, and average, not richest whatever percentile. You have a point, it just doesn't relate to mine.
Since the ranking of the economies were being discussed in the context of trade, I thought it relevant to point out that averages of large masses matter little.
My daughter is not vaccinated now in her last year at school and has won nearly everything. Me and some other people at work had problems with holiday vacs in our 20's so I decided that was it, no more.
Still wishing and hoping eh Paul?
Dream on, we are leaving, if that means no deal then that's what it is, but when Theresa shows them the money it will turn the EU heads, they can't help it!
PS. Sorry been out of contact for a while, bet you've missed me? When we last exchange posts you were trying to tell me how influential MEP's were and the British MEP's let the side down, or something in that vein. The Commissioners make the policies, the MEPS are something like our Lords they can approve or send back for amendments, but they are not the policy makers.. thought you would have known that?![]()
I have to admit I was slightly confused about that bit of @The Outsider's post. I was following for the first bit about the food mountains. And I picked it up again at the end when it got into immigration and means testing pensions. But got a bit lost about the nutrition and vaccinations part, in terms of the relevance to the Brexit debate.
Unless there's a new jab you can get to stop you turning into a whinging remoaner?
Or perhaps there’s a weird typo in there where he meant to say “caught” but it came out “won”?
As Kentonio says the non-vaccinators are just gaining 'free' advantage of herd immunity from those that have of course. A horrible person might think a bout of non life-changing nastiness might just serve them right a bit though.
Just as well Brexit was all about saving money. No it wasn't that was it, can't remember now, the reason keeps changing.
A £65bn economic hit on top of the divorce bill. That extra £350 million a week is looking an ever more distant dream...
MEPs are elected, the Lords are not
The dream was already so distant, there's a possibility that if it gets more distant it'll actually end up getting closer again, like travelling round the world.A £65bn economic hit on top of the divorce bill. That extra £350 million a week is looking an ever more distant dream...
Or tipping off the edge of the flat earth, given the delusion involved.The dream was already so distant, there's a possibility that if it gets more distant it'll actually end up getting closer again, like travelling round the world.
Yeah. 20 years with no earnings growth, but ARRGGGHHH IPSWICH CAN'T BE THE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE!Or tipping off the edge of the flat earth, given the delusion involved.
The uproar around the European city of culture stuff this arvo did make me laugh tbf. Like that's our biggest worry.