prarek
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 8,636
I heard Conte prefers 3 CBs with wingbacks on each flanks.Are they playing 3 or 4 at the back?
Maybe Cuadrado could play FB, depending on setup?
I heard Conte prefers 3 CBs with wingbacks on each flanks.Are they playing 3 or 4 at the back?
Maybe Cuadrado could play FB, depending on setup?
We've yet to play 3 at the back in any of the preseason games. So it's unlikely we'll play it in the upcoming season.I heard Conte prefers 3 CBs with wingbacks on each flanks.
Insanity.My front runners for the title. Their squad is top notch. Have excellent options in midfield and attack. If they are able to acquire Koulibaly, their defense too will be sorted.
Conte seems like a manager who will adjust seamlessly to this league. His style of football is not the most exciting, but it's pragmatic; and pragmatists do well in the league. No European distractions will be a big plus in his first season.
It'll be between them and Arsenal for the title, with Chelsea edging it.
I'd have as as a (distant) third favourite behind the two Manc clubs.
Ivanovic?Beat AC Milan last night 3-1. Traore with a header from 1 yard, a penalty from Oscar and then a nice finish from an angle into the far post also from Oscar. A tremendous direct free kick from someone for Milan's goal.
I didn't see the game (will watch later maybe) but Aina, Terry, Cahill and Azpilicueta as a back four seem to be playing in pretty much all of our pre-season games.
We've got 1 more game left in the pre-season (Werder Bremen on Sunday).
Ivanovic?
Is that back four not a worry? It's the same players who were mostly pretty dreadful last season. I'd hate it if you bought Koulibaly.
I've literally no idea who that is.Aina has been starting in preseason games, looks like he may get the nod
I think City are the favourites, and then Arsenal/ Chelsea/ United are about level behind them. Chelsea and United definitely have the potential to storm to the title though, I wouldn't say that we do.I'd have as as a (distant) third favourite behind the two Manc clubs.
Ivanovic?
Is that back four not a worry? It's the same players who were mostly pretty dreadful last season. I'd hate it if you bought Koulibaly.
Aina will go on loan IMO, or needs to. As does Chalobah. Easy to look good in pre-season in fairness, my Chelsea supporting mate reckons last 3 pre seasons Moses has been far and away stand out player. Conte will be a busy man next few weeks.
Oscar, Moses, Cuadrado (possibly), Pedro, Aina (loan), Chalobah (loan), Begovic, could all go. Thats without Remy and the other loans
Aina will go on loan IMO, or needs to.
Reckon they'll just clinch fourth over City and Spurs.
1 - Man Utd
2 - Arsenal
3 - Liverpool
4 - Chelsea
Ivanovic dislocated his shoulder early in pre season. He actually came on for Aina at the end of last night's game.
You genuinely believe Liverpool will finish 2-3 places above City?![]()
Reckon they'll just clinch fourth over City and Spurs.
1 - Man Utd
2 - Arsenal
3 - Liverpool
4 - Chelsea
Matic has had a rapid decline.Trying to get the ball off/past Kante and Matic will be a bloody nightmare. Is there a stronger defensive pair in midfield?
We made a profit off himWe've sold Djilobodji to Sunderland for £8 million. That's at least double what we paid for him.
What the feck are Sunderland thinking?
No way.Reckon they'll just clinch fourth over City and Spurs.
1 - Man Utd
2 - Arsenal
3 - Liverpool
4 - Chelsea
You genuinely believe Liverpool will finish 2-3 places above City?![]()
Trying to get the ball off/past Kante and Matic will be a bloody nightmare. Is there a stronger defensive pair in midfield?
Possibly not, but it's preferable that a CM duo offers a lot more than they will in terms of attacking play.
Trying to get the ball off/past Kante and Matic will be a bloody nightmare. Is there a stronger defensive pair in midfield?
I don't know if this is the correct thread for this, but I am not sure where else I would put it...
What happened with Chelsea's spending? I'm not going to pretend that they're Bournemouth and hardly spend anything. They're still a rich team. But seeing Castles' latest piece naming high-spending clubs and including "early-era Abramovich" made me think
It seems strange to say, but I never really noticed that they stopped being the club who out-spent everyone. Obviously when City got the takeover, that would've clouded it a bit anyway. But their net spending - especially considering the current price tags to the old ones - isn't close to what it was.
When did they stop being that annoying club who out-bid us for Robben, Essien, Drogba etc? And when/why did their spending slow down?
You'd think I haven't followed football for 10 years asking this, but it's one of those things you don't realise until you think about it
They spent an awful lot last season, and Mourinho increased the wage bill.
Add in the money it took to get rid of Mohrinho and the money they had to pay to Eva and they've probably spent a lot there as well!
I preferred you when you got carried away with your support for the club. That was genuinely endearing because it at least seemed like your heart was in the right place, even at your most irrational. Your newfound obssessive need to snipe about our manager is a lot less charming. In fact, it's getting kind of tedious.
I preferred you when you got carried away with your support for the club. That was genuinely endearing because it at least seemed like your heart was in the right place, even at your most irrational (e.g. sticking up for Van Gaal long past the point when he'd made absolute shite out of our team).
Your newfound obssessive need to snipe about our current manager is a lot less charming. In fact, it's getting kind of tedious.
I think you'll find in the years you've been gone I have gotten more and more insufferable and the standards of my posts keep declining.