Cristiano Ronaldo - Performances (wums will be thread banned)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doesn't matter that he's on the decline, he'd still be the best player in the league. You're crazy if you wouldn't want him back, especially given we have a feck ton of money to spend and it's not like we're stocked with good wingers that he would be in front of.
 
I think his motivation (lack of) is a bigger factor right now than an actual physical decline. He's clearly not trying his best, and there have been a lot of rumors about him leaving. He has broken the record that cements his legacy at Real, and there is not much else he can do there now (with Barca being so strong). I would gladly take him back for a reasonable fee. 60 million pounds sounds fair.

He's won everything with us as well.

I don't think he'd have the motivation here as well.
 
He'll be 31 next summer and he's not looked great for a while. 60 million + huge wages. No thanks.
 
I'll drive to Madrid and pick him up for free if the club agree a £60m deal for him.
 
Doesn't matter that he's on the decline, he'd still be the best player in the league. You're crazy if you wouldn't want him back, especially given we have a feck ton of money to spend and it's not like we're stocked with good wingers that he would be in front of.

I'd want him back for 60 mil.

I just don't think that will be the fee and Real will want more than what they paid themselves.
 
He'll be 31 next summer and he's not looked great for a while. 60 million + huge wages. No thanks.

Cristiano has scored 18 times in 16 games this season for club and country, 13 of those goals have been for Madrid (link). That does not seem like 'awhile' to me.
 
Disaster waiting happen, espcially if Rooney is still around.

He was unbelievable for us but I doubt he'd have anying like the same impact if he came back, it could end up been a sad way for him to end his career imo.

2-3 years at PSG where they'll play around him, then off the to the MLS.
 
It makes more sense for him to go to PSG than United.
This. What people also have to remember is that he is a different player now to the one that played for us. His impact outside of scoring goals isn't half as much. Not even quater IMO.
 
60m on a 31 year old. Jesus Christ. Real will be laughing.

If the club has the money to spend why should it not spend it? Its not just any 31 year old, its Cristiano Ronaldo. As I said above this season the man has scored 18 goals in 16 games. He's built like a tank and has stated its his intention to go on for another six or seven years. This is a player who guarantees at least 20 goals a season for you as long as he's fit. Nobody at United scored that many last season. I'd happily see United spend £60 million on bringing Ronnie home.
 
60m on a 31 year old. Jesus Christ. Real will be laughing.

They would never sell him to us for that little and we would be extremely fortunate to get him for that little.
 
Nah, 60 mil is ridiculous (together with astronomical wages). He would be our Kaka (Real's Kaka). 30 max I would say.

Besides, we don't even win that many penalties.
 
Just saw the story on BBC. The interest is official :eek:
http://www.bbc.com/sport/0/football/34893228

Cristiano Ronaldo: Man Utd want Real Madrid forward - Van Gaal
Manchester United manager Louis van Gaal has confirmed he wants to bring Cristiano Ronaldo back to Old Trafford.

Portugal forward Ronaldo left United for Real Madrid in 2009 for £80m and has become the Spanish side's all-time leading goalscorer.

However, speculation persists that the 30-year-old is set to leave Madrid.

"We are looking at all players, not just Ronaldo. But these players are mostly ungettable," said Van Gaal. "With Ronaldo, let's wait and hope."

More to follow.
 
Cristiano has scored 18 times in 16 games this season for club and country, 13 of those goals have been for Madrid (link). That does not seem like 'awhile' to me.

Didn't 8 goals come in like 2 matches or something. I'm sure its been done discussed a million times.

The worst thing with Ronaldo is that his attitude is woeful. We have some good young players and his constant moaning if he isn't passed to or if he doesn't score is the last thing they need for their development. If the Rooney situation is teaching us anything it is that we shouldn't indulge with players who aren't quite at their best anymore.

We are better off focusing on players like Martial and helping them to develop, and bringing in younger players who have their best years ahead rather than behind.
 
This summer is going to be madness. The amount of money allows us to buy a few superstars if we have our bids accepted.
Let's say Balague is right and Barca choose to renew Messi over Neymar, it's ridiculous that we could sign both.
Not saying we will but it's outrageous the amounf of money we generate
 
For the first time, I think there is a very good chance of we want him and move for him. I just hope we don't. I know a lot here want him back but I think a lot of people are basing that on what he did here in the past. He's been awful for quite a while and at his age, I can't see how he can improve. Also, he's a totally different player to the one we sold. LVG called him a winger, but he really isn't any more.
There also have been Rumours that he's been taking pain killers for a while due to chronic ankle and knee problems. He would be coming to a more physical league when his body is in natural decline.
This transfer doesn't make sense to me no matter how I look at it.
 
To the transfer thread to keep performance and rumours separate?
 
No thanks, why do people forget what our team is lacking everytime they hear a superstar's name. We need a top striker (might have found one in Martial) and a winger a la Costa who can open up defences, is threatening, beats opponents and can assists (right winger) and even though we have 4 no 10's on paper (Rooney, Herrera, Mata, Januzaj) none of them is good enough consistently on that position.
 
For the first time, I think there is a very good chance of we want him and move for him. I just hope we don't. I know a lot here want him back but I think a lot of people are basing that on what he did here in the past. He's been awful for quite a while and at his age, I can't see how he can improve. Also, he's a totally different player to the one we sold. LVG called him a winger, but he really isn't any more.
There also have been Rumours that he's been taking pain killers for a while due to chronic ankle and knee problems. He would be coming to a more physical league when his body is in natural decline.
This transfer doesn't make sense to me no matter how I look at it.

Do you honestly thing Van Gaal doesn't know what position he plays ?
 
No thanks, why do people forget what our team is lacking everytime they hear a superstar's name. We need a top striker (might have found one in Martial) and a winger a la Costa who can open up defences, is threatening, beats opponents and can assists (right winger) and even though we have 4 no 10's on paper (Rooney, Herrera, Mata, Januzaj) none of them is good enough consistently on that position.

I'm not sure whether Ronaldo adds the pace we need but second-best player in the world: no thanks? :lol:
 
I'm not sure whether Ronaldo adds the pace we need but second-best player in the world: no thanks? :lol:

Amazing isn't it. To be clear, not a club in the world would say no to Ronaldo just as no club would say no to Messi. People just get into this reality distortion field when it comes to Ronnie.
 
We can afford to spend 60 million on a player who might only be useful for one season, money isn't an issue. If there is a chance he'd come back, we'd be mad not to do it.
 
Romantic idea but £60m is too much given that we'll only get 3, at a push 4, top seasons out of him. If we are lucky.
He's not just a player. He's a business model. The likes of him, you make your money back on in 6 months. The most marketable player in the world playing for the most marketable club in the world is a dream partnership before you take about what he does on the pitch.
 
I'm not sure whether Ronaldo adds the pace we need but second-best player in the world: no thanks? :lol:
He's the 2nd best finisher in the world but our main problem is creating chances, how woulf that work out? His field play is non-existent but he gets on the end of attacks and scores, we need players to initiate those attacks, pace, creativity, players who can beat a man, players who can spot out a pass. Literally Ronaldo wouldnt add too much to our play at the moment even though he's absolutely world class.
 
I'm not sure whether Ronaldo adds the pace we need but second-best player in the world: no thanks? :lol:

He's not the 2nd best player in the world.

Maybe not even 3rd best.

The Ronaldo that was at United isn't the same Ronaldo now.
 
Romantic idea but £60m is too much given that we'll only get 3, at a push 4, top seasons out of him. If we are lucky.

Pretty cheap when you consideer we will easily make twice or more in return from shirt sales and trophies
 
We can afford to spend 60 million on a player who might only be useful for one season, money isn't an issue. If there is a chance he'd come back, we'd be mad not to do it.
:lol:

Do you really think your owners think that way? Just because United make a lot of money doesn't mean the owners don't give a feck what happens with it.
 
He's not the 2nd best player in the world.

Maybe not even 3rd best.

The Ronaldo that was at United isn't the same Ronaldo now.

You're clutching at straws. Its Ronaldo and yes we would jump at the chance of him coming back.
 
as amazing as he'd be and would suit our solid set up to have a presence like that up top the big argument against him is longevity of the signing.

probing that further, we all know what ronaldos ego is like. its made him who he is, but we will undoubtedly be dealing with him on his decline if we sign him. it won't be pretty and could ruin a team.
 
He's the 2nd best finisher in the world but our main problem is creating chances, how woulf that work out? His field play is non-existent but he gets on the end of attacks and scores, we need players to initiate those attacks, pace, creativity, players who can beat a man, players who can spot out a pass. Literally Ronaldo wouldnt add too much to our play at the moment even though he's absolutely world class.
He also can't play in goal or ref a game so good job we wouldn't buy him for that isn't it?
He's a finisher, he still has pace and can lead the line. Hes a player who doesn't need 10 chances per game and is a player who can be the focal point of any team.
But no, well quote names like Griezman because he's a 'United fan' or god knows who else. Anderson? Fecking Sane?
There are literally no player in the world we can sign who is better than he is.
IMO he'll follow the Ibrahimovich path and be a top player at 34
 
as amazing as he'd be and would suit our solid set up to have a presence like that up top the big argument against him is longevity of the signing.

probing that further, we all know what ronaldos ego is like. its made him who he is, but we will undoubtedly be dealing with him on his decline if we sign him. it won't be pretty and could ruin a team.

He wouldn't be as good as he was with Madrid or during his first time here, but would still easily be our best player, which is quite remarkable when you think about it. The goals would flow and the likes of Martial, Memphis, Lingard et al would benefit tremendously. Our solid defense, experienced midfield, and Ronaldo in attack to compliment the others would instantly take this side to the top of Europe alongside the Bayern and Barca.
 
Maybe Van Gaal thinks, sod it, it's my last year in management just get him!

He probably does, and also has the likes of Fergie and Giggs actively campaigning for it.
 
The cost is kind of silly, but even at 31 he is so much better than anyone else we have in attack it's unreal.

If we could unload Rooney wages would be comparable, just need to negotiate down the transfer fee. He kind of does look fed up as all hell at Madrid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.