De Gea Contract Situation

Do you think David De Gea will sign a new contract at Man Utd this season?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Yes, but he'll still leave by the end of the season


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week. These are the figures I read and these are the figures I made my post upon. If you have particular insight into De Gea's contractual matters feel free to let me know. I have no doubt that nobody knows the accurate figures, especially not the British media. Based upon my own speculation, and in line with what you've offered to other players, I would say United would offer De Gea somewhere in the region of 200-250k per week pre-tax to tempt him to stay.

My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

I'll stop here because I didn't expect certain people to be so unwelcoming of a difference in opinion!

Selling him for £18m would reflect even worse on us.
 
My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

Nah, that literally makes no plausible sense. Rolling over, accepting a measly fee, and letting him go will make United superior ? Struggling to see the rationale in that.. Isn't a better method for boosting United's image standing our ground until we get what we want, meanwhile creating unrest in Madrid's camp by unsettling Ramos ? Sergio or a record fee, Madrid can pick their poison. Even publications in Spain are lauding Woodward's business acumen. How exactly is that damaging to United ?
 
Have you ever seen either of them attract an established world class player over the past decade?

Suarez and Bale weren't in the last year of their contract when they moved. They both attracted interest from other teams which bumps up the fee - Arsenal and others for Suarez and United for Bale. They are also both attackers which obviously have a higher going rate.

De Gea wants 65k at Madrid over 200k at United. He doesn't want anywhere else. He's embarrassing your club right now, refusing to stay at it for even 3x more money. Fergie would be kicking him out the door on his arse for free just to make the saga stop but instead youre clinging onto him like he's a player above your level which is exactly what I'd expect to see a lesser team like Spurs or Liverpool do.

At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week. These are the figures I read and these are the figures I made my post upon
. If you have particular insight into De Gea's contractual matters feel free to let me know. I have no doubt that nobody knows the accurate figures, especially not the British media. Based upon my own speculation, and in line with what you've offered to other players, I would say United would offer De Gea somewhere in the region of 200-250k per week pre-tax to tempt him to stay.

My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

I'll stop here because I didn't expect certain people to be so unwelcoming of a difference in opinion!

The bold is the basic flaw in your argument, you can't even get the basis of your point right.
 
At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week. These are the figures I read and these are the figures I made my post upon. If you have particular insight into De Gea's contractual matters feel free to let me know. I have no doubt that nobody knows the accurate figures, especially not the British media. Based upon my own speculation, and in line with what you've offered to other players, I would say United would offer De Gea somewhere in the region of 200-250k per week pre-tax to tempt him to stay.

My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

I'll stop here because I didn't expect certain people to be so unwelcoming of a difference in opinion!
Should we give him away for free then?, because I don't think Madrid has even bid yet.
 
My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United.

This part bothers me, he hasn't put an official transfer request, if he wants to go he makes it official, otherwise United will ask as much as they feel is a right price and will take their time doing so.
An other thing, the club put the offer on the table months ago, when De Gea was still pretending that he might sign a new contract.
 
Have you ever seen either of them attract an established world class player over the past decade?

Suarez and Bale weren't in the last year of their contract when they moved. They both attracted interest from other teams which bumps up the fee - Arsenal and others for Suarez and United for Bale. They are also both attackers which obviously have a higher going rate.

De Gea wants 65k at Madrid over 200k at United. He doesn't want anywhere else. He's embarrassing your club right now, refusing to stay at it for even 3x more money. Fergie would be kicking him out the door on his arse for free just to make the saga stop but instead youre clinging onto him like he's a player above your level which is exactly what I'd expect to see a lesser team like Spurs or Liverpool do.

Is this how you make yourself feel better about Arsenal consistently losing all their best players over the years? That it would have been embarrassing to hold onto them.

The transfer window is barely open. De Gea will leave and we'll get our pound of flesh.

It's very simple.
 
it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid.


There is an unique set of circumstances with DDG in which Madrid is his home town and happen to be one of the greatest clubs in the world. Unlike Arsenal who everybody knows are vastly inferior to United and haven't won anything of importance in a decade! If United look inferior then so be it we are what we are but in the eyes of every player United are a bigger club than Arsenal. So we'll just have to contend with this.
 
Fair enough reply. For a club that prides itself on being up there with the elite clubs in the world, I think clinging onto a player who would happily take approximately 1/2-1/3 of the wages to sign for Madrid as the entire football world watches on is a bad look. Maybe embarrassing wasn't the word I should have said to get that point across.
Maybe because Real aren't always sniffing round your players and we might just have had enough of it. They think they can just flutter their eyelashes and we will give in, we are putting up a bit of a fight this time. It might actually make them think twice about it in future.
 
The article I read claimed it was £65/200k and both figures pre-tax so not sure where I'm confused.

and you are totally bought into it which means you are a no brainer

certainly united is not proficient in selling players since unlike arsenal united are not a feeder club. but gooners are really least deserved to make a criticize in selling when they insisted one of jones/smalling to include into the deal when we tried to sign one of your want away defender, and need not to mentioned to insist on us to pay 24m on a 29 years old striker with one year left with his contract.

btw, do you need me to tell you how the figure of 24m came up?
 
At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week.

and you must be a genius to come into a conclusion of refusing a contract worths 3x more money:

He's embarrassing your club right now, refusing to stay at it for even 3x more money.
 
Last edited:
Nah, that literally makes no plausible sense. Rolling over, accepting a measly fee, and letting him go will make United superior ? Struggling to see the rationale in that.. Isn't a better method for boosting United's image standing our ground until we get what we want, meanwhile creating unrest in Madrid's camp by unsettling Ramos ? Sergio or a record fee, Madrid can pick their poison. Even publications in Spain are lauding Woodward's business acumen. How exactly is that damaging to United ?

Well you are talking to an Arsenal fan tbf
 
If he leaves he leaves, I just don't want him to be sold on the final day with no time to find a replacement.

My biggest nightmare in this whole saga, really. I applaud Ed for what he's doing, but please don't allow him to be sold at the last second of the window, even if we get an absurd fee for him.
 
Have you ever seen either of them attract an established world class player over the past decade?

Suarez and Bale weren't in the last year of their contract when they moved. They both attracted interest from other teams which bumps up the fee - Arsenal and others for Suarez and United for Bale. They are also both attackers which obviously have a higher going rate.

De Gea wants 65k at Madrid over 200k at United. He doesn't want anywhere else. He's embarrassing your club right now, refusing to stay at it for even 3x more money. Fergie would be kicking him out the door on his arse for free just to make the saga stop but instead youre clinging onto him like he's a player above your level which is exactly what I'd expect to see a lesser team like Spurs or Liverpool do.

Man please! We've already got a list of possible targets. United are just not going to roll over for Real. If they want him they need to meet our valuation, simple as that. I doubt Chelsea/Mourinho would just roll over if Real came in for Courtois, they'd make em pay through the nose and you know it!
 
Seems pretty clear @The Purist is on a WUM in here considering he's been online and failed to respond to all the people highlighting his nonsense.
 
Frankly, I'm embarrassed for him, amongst other things I'm clearly embarrassed about.

The entire Redcafe world is watching the thread and that includes lurkers. If they see @The Purist trying to pretend that he is serious, it isn't a good look for him.
 
Real are expected to announce Casillas's departure tomorrow. I think despite all the posturing in the media, this deal might be already done unfortunately.
 
Rolling over, accepting a measly fee, and letting him go will make United superior ?

Nicely put.
Personally I think that Purist is merely have a laugh at our expense. He knows we are losing our best player and he can't help but goad MUFC fans.

I've said this before though, I wouldn't let let him leave for any fee - we want to win trophies. We already have the biggest transfer budget...we now need the best players, not more money.
Even if we got £50M for him and replaced with Lloris, for example, it puts us in a weaker position.
Rumour has it that Madrid asked Chelsea for Courtois and CFC put a sky high price on him, which deterred Madrid.
We need to tell Madrid to take DDG next Summer and they can keep Ramos (which they will, anyway, as he loves Madrid).

I do wonder what would happen if Mourinho was with us - would he allow Woodward to even talk to Madrid about DDG.
 
Nicely put.
Personally I think that Purist is merely have a laugh at our expense. He knows we are losing our best player and he can't help but goad MUFC fans.

I've said this before though, I wouldn't let let him leave for any fee - we want to win trophies. We already have the biggest transfer budget...we now need the best players, not more money.
Even if we got £50M for him and replaced with Lloris, for example, it puts us in a weaker position.
Rumour has it that Madrid asked Chelsea for Courtois and CFC put a sky high price on him, which deterred Madrid.
We need to tell Madrid to take DDG next Summer and they can keep Ramos (which they will, anyway, as he loves Madrid).

I do wonder what would happen if Mourinho was with us - would he allow Woodward to even talk to Madrid about DDG.

While I agree that we shouldn't roll over and give de Gea away for peanuts to RM (we don't need it like you said), if that really is what David wants the club will cooperate if they receive a fair offer. LvG has always been open about that: if a player doesn't want to play for him he will be let go - but at the right price. I think that is the right stance, it's not fun to lose your best players but it happens and the club will move on.

Mourinho has said the same not too long ago using Hazard as an example. He said that even though he signed a contract, if he really wanted out Chelsea would accept an offer for him.

If the right offer doesn't come in I'm for keeping players to their contracts though.
 
At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week. These are the figures I read and these are the figures I made my post upon. If you have particular insight into De Gea's contractual matters feel free to let me know. I have no doubt that nobody knows the accurate figures, especially not the British media. Based upon my own speculation, and in line with what you've offered to other players, I would say United would offer De Gea somewhere in the region of 200-250k per week pre-tax to tempt him to stay.

My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

I'll stop here because I didn't expect certain people to be so unwelcoming of a difference in opinion!
Good. Because you were either WUMming or talking bullshit.
 
Starting to look more and more that he will be here this season and leave on a free next year.

With it looking likely that Ramos will stay, that's the only outcome I see. Or rather that's the only outcome that I can see that makes us look good.
 
Starting to look more and more that he will be here this season and leave on a free next year.

With it looking likely that Ramos will stay, that's the only outcome I see. Or rather that's the only outcome that I can see that makes us look good.

Been thinking the same. Also, I've been wondering how the fans will take to him if he does play for us at OT again. That he didn't come out publicly and say he was a slave or anything is probably a point in his favour, but I doubt he'll be as warmly regarded as he has been this season (especially if he has a dip in form).
 
If he leaves he leaves, I just don't want him to be sold on the final day with no time to find a replacement.

My biggest nightmare in this whole saga, really. I applaud Ed for what he's doing, but please don't allow him to be sold at the last second of the window, even if we get an absurd fee for him.
I feel like we got Valdez as insurance in case this happens.
 
At the end of the day, the article I read stated:
De Gea will earn £65,000 a week after tax at Madrid. United are willing to offer £200,000 a week - tax taking this to around £110,000 per week. These are the figures I read and these are the figures I made my post upon. If you have particular insight into De Gea's contractual matters feel free to let me know. I have no doubt that nobody knows the accurate figures, especially not the British media. Based upon my own speculation, and in line with what you've offered to other players, I would say United would offer De Gea somewhere in the region of 200-250k per week pre-tax to tempt him to stay.

My original point was as follows: the entire football world is watching the transfer and that includes players. If they see De Gea trying to leave your club and accepting lesser wages elsewhere, it isn't a good look for United. That is my opinion. I think you'd be better served selling him now for around £18m and getting a new keeper in to end this because, in my honest opinion, it makes United look vastly inferior to Madrid. I understand the financial benefits of trying to act stubborn, no doubt. But I think the saga is damaging the image of the club a bit.. similar to when we lost Fabregas to Barcelona and I felt we should sell him.

I'll stop here because I didn't expect certain people to be so unwelcoming of a difference in opinion!
Purist,I think that the wages difference are not so big.What I read is talking about 5m€net +bonus,anyway these last months euro-pound value has changed a lot and perhaps the press is confused.Obviously I agree about a sale for 18m£(I dont understand what you mean about the financial benefits of being stubborn),it's just my opinion but I think that the idea/hope of keeping a player in his last year is really naive
 
I'm rooting for the Casillas transfer to Porto to go through. The way I look at it, when he leaves, it gives us leverage on the De Gea fee because Madrid will be desperate. They're not going to be comfortable having Navas as their first choice keeper. If Casillas leaves, I demand 40 million plus or they can feck off and wait until next summer.
 
I'm rooting for the Casillas transfer to Porto to go through. The way I look at it, when he leaves, it gives us leverage on the De Gea fee because Madrid will be desperate. They're not going to be comfortable having Navas as their first choice keeper. If Casillas leaves, I demand 40 million plus or they can feck off and wait until next summer.
The cynic in me thinks that Madrid won't let Casillas go without knowing the De Gea is on his way. I hope you right though.
 
Purist,I think that the wages difference are not so big.What I read is talking about 5m€net +bonus,anyway these last months euro-pound value has changed a lot and perhaps the press is confused.Obviously I agree about a sale for 18m£(I dont understand what you mean about the financial benefits of being stubborn),it's just my opinion but I think that the idea/hope of keeping a player in his last year is really naive

I have mentioned it before to you it didn't do Dortmund any harm keeping Lewondowski for his final year.
 
I have mentioned it before to you it didn't do Dortmund any harm keeping Lewondowski for his final year.
I remember that you told me , but I don´t know how Borussia works or how it was the concrete situation or even the name of Lewandowski´s agent. Certainly it happened several times but I still think it is not the general rule, besides being Mendes involved changes everything in my opinion
 
Starting to look more and more that he will be here this season and leave on a free next year.

With it looking likely that Ramos will stay, that's the only outcome I see. Or rather that's the only outcome that I can see that makes us look good.

If De Gea doesn't leave this summer, the situation could change. Madrid are already making changes in goal for this year and that person could turn out to be a long-term solution. De Gea might rethink his options based on the experience of this summer, I don't think it's gone as he planned. I don't think it's likely, but there is a possibility he could sign an extension.
 
Speculation - I'd be shocked if De Gea was getting that little. He'll obviously get less then he gets at United (though with tax brakes it won't be so bad).

He's embarassing our club because he wants to go home, so he can be with his family and - most importantly - his girlfriend of however many years? And yet, still hasn't kicked up a fuss, hasn't spoken out in public, hasn't tried to force a move... and we are using all the time we have at our disposal (note: we have quite a lot of time here) to ensure that we get the best deal possible from a club that we know a) only want De Gea and b) have a lot of money?

Yeah, I'm super embarrassed.
Aye, that was a strange "opinion" indeed. How exactly is DDG embarrassing us? FFS.
 
I remember that you told me , but I don´t know how Borussia works or how it was the concrete situation or even the name of Lewandowski´s agent. Certainly it happened several times but I still think it is not the general rule, besides being Mendes involved changes everything in my opinion
Were you & @Vato part of the 800 chanting for DDG? :mad:

;)
 
I felt really strongly about this before. Now I just want it to be over. I'd love him to stay but the main thing is don't get the piss taken out of us. The guys worth 50 fecking million but I'd rather he went on a free than sold him for peanuts.
 
I remember that you told me , but I don´t know how Borussia works or how it was the concrete situation or even the name of Lewandowski´s agent. Certainly it happened several times but I still think it is not the general rule, besides being Mendes involved changes everything in my opinion

I think your putting a lot of faith in agents where United is concerned, if we don't want to sell then Mendes can do nothing.What is he going to do threaten to move Di Maria on if we don't sell you De Gea? Madrid either pay what we want or he stays
 
This should have been over by now. It's just bad for us. We've got our first game coming up in eight days and we have a keeper who if he's around is a definite starter, except we don't know if he'll be around for long.

Should have given Real an ultimatum - If you don't make a bid we'll accept by Monday, it's over. Forget about fecking Ramos and move on. It's not actually beneficial for us in a professional sense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.