I believe that accident happened at a range in which the gun range owned the weapons.That nine year old that accidentally shot the instructor with an Uzi. Under what circumstances could any law abiding citizen have the need to own an Uzi.
I believe that accident happened at a range in which the gun range owned the weapons.That nine year old that accidentally shot the instructor with an Uzi. Under what circumstances could any law abiding citizen have the need to own an Uzi.
Have terrorists ever specifically targeted gay people before?That guy with the guns and explosives in his car was up to something as well, apparently
Man with weapons and possible explosives arrested, was going to L.A. gay pride parade, sources say
Not only that, but incidents where they actually thought a reasonable response would be to shoot someone in retaliation.
Same boat.I must admit that even though I think it is just wrong that you can decide to buy a AR-15, a UZI or a MAC-10 on Saturday, and basically have it in your hand by Tuesday, I would own the shit out of those guns if I lived in the US.
Because shooting stuff at the range is fun, just admit it.
I must admit that even though I think it is just wrong that you can decide to buy a AR-15, a UZI or a MAC-10 on Saturday, and basically have it in your hand by Tuesday, I would own the shit out of those guns if I lived in the US.
Because shooting stuff at the range is fun, just admit it.
That guy with the guns and explosives in his car was up to something as well, apparently
Man with weapons and possible explosives arrested, was going to L.A. gay pride parade, sources say
Yes, that's the bit that gets me. The idea that in a civilized society we can allow people to be judge, jury and executioner all at once.
Have terrorists ever specifically targeted gay people before?
Aye, fire alarms are obviously statistically more likely to start a life-threatening fire than detect them. Plus, you know, the risk that the batteries will fall out and embed themselves in the brains of the homeowners at 800 feet/second.Agree, why have a fire alarm in your house? Fires happen so seldom.
I'd wager that if Mr.Meth was standing in my living room off his rocker at 3 am on a Saturday night wielding a gun I wouldn't wait for the law.
I suppose I should just let the intruder do as he likes then? No thanks. If you do not want to risk getting shot, don't break into someone's house. Don't mug somebody. It's quite simple.Yes, that's the bit that gets me. The idea that in a civilized society we can allow people to be judge, jury and executioner all at once.
Aye, fire alarms are obviously statistically more likely to start a life-threatening fire than detect them. Plus, you know, the risk that the batteries will fall out and embed themselves in the brains of the homeowners at 800 feet/second.
If you think that's fun, try calling in an airstike from a Dutch F-16. Or an Apache gunship. Holy shit, the ground itself rumbled.
Which would not have occurred if they could not get their hands on fire-arms. We agree.
However, in highlighting the one or two incidents where criminals have been able to get their hands on guns, I'm not sure you're perceptive enough to realise you have defeated your own argument. Which of the two has the higher frequency of mass shootings, the US or Europe? And if the answer is Europe, which it is, then you agree that Europe's stricter gun control laws make it harder for people to carry out mass shootings and, as a result, gun control leads to less deaths.
I suppose I should just let the intruder do as he likes then? No thanks. If you do not want to risk getting shot, don't break into someone's house. Don't mug somebody. It's quite simple.
Pretty tasteless comment right there. I wouldn't say that about an anti-gun activist getting killed by a gun weilding criminal.The gun rights activist who was driving her car and got shot in the back by her 3 year old. You have to say that's karma.
I think that misses the point somewhat. A civilian can still buy an Uzi in the US.I believe that accident happened at a range in which the gun range owned the weapons.
I suppose I should just let the intruder do as he likes then? No thanks. If you do not want to risk getting shot, don't break into someone's house. Don't mug somebody. It's quite simple.
Have you been in a position to do that? If so, how many times did you get reprimanded for calling in random airstrikes? I sure know I would.
That's in Raqqa. I'm talking about, if the pigs are targeting them in the westI keep reading about ISIS throwing them off tall buildings.
I believe that accident happened at a range in which the gun range owned the weapons.
She should have been packing and shot her 3 year old first.The gun rights activist who was driving her car and got shot in the back by her 3 year old. You have to say that's karma.
Pretty tasteless comment right there. I wouldn't say that about an anti-gun activist getting killed by a gun weilding criminal.
That's in Raqqa. I'm talking about, if the pigs are targeting them in the west
You obviously haven't visited South Carolina.
America has always been a violent society.
I think it is obvious that I'm speaking from a law abiding gun owners point of view here.Most people who get shot weren't doing either of those things.
I've played with lots of big boom stuff. Lighting up wrecked skodas with a GPMG was mental. Tracer fire at night is romantic too.
Do you have children? Where do you keep your gun? Do you ever worry about someone else - albeit a child, friend, relative, - getting hold of the gun?
I dont understand how it's in anyway sensible to keep a gun.
Is your gun kept in a safe? If so, how are you ever going to get to it if you need it.
If it's not in a safe, then you can't guarantee that at some point, someone else is going to have access to it. Can you?
Wasn't there a case of a guy killing a suspicious looking unarmed black man running away from his house? Was quite a huge story. The case set a precedent cause the man was acquitted. Think the law became "stand your ground" or something like that?Most gun owners don't know the laws about this stuff so unlawful killings happen regularly.
I think it is obvious that I'm speaking from a law abiding gun owners point of view here.
Maybe I should say, if you don't want to get shot by a law abiding citizen in self defense, do not... etc.
Well, yes, criminals who own guns and kill people do kill them unlawfully.Most gun owners don't know the laws about this stuff so unlawful killings happen regularly.
Not sure. I remember that nutter years ago who blew up the Admiral Duncan pub in Soho to kill gays and also wanted to start a race war with blacks. More lone wolfs than terrorist organisations per se.Have terrorists ever specifically targeted gay people before?
Wasn't there a case of a guy killing a suspicious looking unarmed black man running away from his house? Was quite a huge story. The case set a precedent cause the man was acquitted. Think the law became "stand your ground" or something like that?
In that case, I apologize for my comment.It was her comments after that were more tasteless. Also what about the poor child? He will have to grow up knowing he shot his mum because she left her gun lying around in the back of her car. And she has the nerve to lecture people about gun rights? She tweeted some pretty awful comments from her hospital bed too. Sorry for the lack of sympathy where she is concerned, but for the child, I have endless amounts.
Lol are you about to argue the semantics of "law abiding citizen"?You've never, ever broken any laws?
America has always been a violent society. Its the serial killer capital of the world, and that has nothing to do with guns.
Part of this easy recourse to violence may be down to the cultural legacy of a 'frontier society', but, imo, the nature of Americans themselves probably plays a part. All Americans came from somewhere else. They're descendants of people who uprooted themselves from the known and took a dangerous leap into the unknown. It's likely they differed in character and experience from those who stayed at home. They brought those genes to the New World.
In character inventories Americans score significantly higher on 'extroversion' than Europeans. Extroverted people are less inhibited, cheat more often, divorce more often, change jobs more often, crash their cars more often ... and, if their extroversion is tinged with psychopathology, kill more often.
Australia, another immigrant society, also has high crime and violence statistics.