Gladiator
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,586
His initial positioning is usually better, he is able to better anticipate what the opposition will do with the ball. I think he covers spaces left by others better as well. As with more mobile and quicker players they usually are able to get themselves out of trouble whereas Arteta has slowed down in that respect. He is kind of like Busquets (obviously not as good) or like Carrick is for your lot. Flamini is the type of guy who might cover 12km in a match and so it appears he is literally everywhere but Arteta is someone who knows where he can and can't go and hangs around in those areas.
I'm not saying Flamini isn't good but in our first XI Arteta would start and I'd say rightly so. Arteta has off the pitch had a big influence as well, a really big character in the dressing room and well respected.
That is the case with many players, when they are slower physically they make up the yards in their head. Per Mertesacker is another like that and in the past we have had players who don't read the game well enough imo.
I'm sorry. You havent been watching flamini closely then if that's how you're going to sum him up. Arteta is vulnerable when opponents get past him. In terms of directing players in relation to their positioning, he doesnt do it enough. Arteta does a good job of covering the spaces in front of him but he also does get drawn out at times and it can lead to situations where he makes silly fouls. Would flamini make the same silly fouls? I'll leave that for you to decide.
For me, Arteta controls the offensive part of Arsenal's play better than Flamini while Flamini is a better organizer of the defensive side of Arsenal's play. Feel free to disagree but that's just the way I see it. But you seem to not realize why Flamini floats into these spaces.