Spiersey
Full Member
Thought Arsenal looked a lot more dangerous whenever Santi was in the middle, rather than Ozil. Ozil was average in my opinion.
That's a TV muppet's highlights-driven view of the gameThought Arsenal looked a lot more dangerous whenever Santi was in the middle, rather than Ozil. Ozil was average in my opinion.
Cazorla's always been a better big game player than Ozil.
His free-kick against Real a couple of years ago.![]()
That's a TV muppet's highlights-driven view of the game
Hardly. Last night he looked much more dangerous than Ozil in the second half. Whilst I don't doubt Ozil to be a better player, last night Cazorla should have moved centrally.
That's a TV muppet's highlights-driven view of the game
It's like he doesn't like playing football. As soon as he gets the ball, he's looking for the closest person within 5 yards who he can pass it to.
Agreed, he goes around the pitch in pity for himself.Yeah, great analysis. Spot on.
He contributed to the first goal.
He's done nothing.
edit: Not in reply to kouroux.
Mug in the stand view if you like.
underperforming big money transfers are always humorous for fans of "rival" clubs.He does receive a comical amount of flak on here.
underperforming big money transfers are always humorous for fans of "rival" clubs.
Nobody claimed Andy Carroll was one of the top 5 players in the world though (that's a world I don't want to imagine).Andy Carroll was funny. Ozil's been good, not great, with room for improvement. And we know he can improve, unlike Carroll.
Ozil just contributed to Arsenal's second goal.
I'm trying to prove that he did contribute. He had a good game and it shows just how much more his game is made easier for him when players are moving in front of him.That was all Chamberlain, I'm afraid.
Ozil's pass was neat, but nothing out of the ordinary. He had thirty yards of space to thread that ball into.
I'm trying to prove that he did contribute. He had a good game and it shows just how much more his game is made easier for him when players are moving in front of him.
You weren't jumping over my post. No need to apologise, mate. I agree that it was a basic pass to be made. He's had two good games in a week against us and Liverpool which is promising, but I thought this was a great opportunity to rest him.I'm in agreement that he had a good game (and apologies for appearing to jump all over your post, MM), but that 'pre-assist' pass was genuinely run-of-the-mill stuff.
Still, much better from him today.
Well he had 20 good minutes against us but today he was good throughout indeed. He does look tired though and I'm surprised Wenger didn't rest him today.You weren't jumping over my post. No need to apologise, mate. I agree that it was a basic pass to be made. He's had two good games in a week against us and Liverpool which is promising, but I thought this was a great opportunity to rest him.