- Joined
- Jun 15, 2000
- Messages
- 90,056
- Location
- Centreback
- Caf Award
- Caf Lifetime Achievement Award 2020
Come on now, it is a sci-fi movie based on a sci-fi book. It wasn't supposed to be scientifically accurate. Well, for most part it wasn't supposed to be so. When it comes to HAL, I think that Kubrick and Clarke (writer of the book) had a conversation with Marven Minsky (back then, the leading researcher in AI) about that part. I think that HAL part are some of the best pieces that have been ever done in cinematography.
From Kubrick's movies (I know that you dislike them), only Dr. Strangelove is clearly better.
I like Dr Strangelove even less. The scientific inaccuracy I can live with - most sci-fi is rubbish in this respect anyway - the pretentious existential bollocks is what really pisses me off.