Billy Blaggs
Flacco of the Blaggs tribe


Can't people just give Trump the respect he deserves? Haters gonna hate.
What a conversation that was between Avenatti and Dershowitz on Anderson
Can't people just give Trump the respect he deserves? Haters gonna hate.
I guess you're just a typical socialist snowflake who can't handle the truth...Respect? What? Respect a conman? Compulsive & pathological liar, bully, racist, sexist prick who has abused countless women and cheated multiple times even when his wife was pregnant and after when his son was new born then paid the women off? The man who has endangered countless lives, the environment & world security and has destroyed alliances that have been strong for decades purely for profit or out of spite.
I am struggling to think of anyone who deserves less respect than Trump.
Exactly. He's the GlastonSpurs of the USA.DADDY DADDY DADDY
WANT WANT WANT
JOBS JOBS JOBS
I guess you're just a typical socialist snowflake who can't handle the truth...
I agree with you. He's riding a the tidal wave of a positive business cycle and sentiment buoyed by his populist and protectionist blatherings. Yet he'll take credit for everything good and cry Fake News! at anything remotely critical. He's a scumbag. I was mocking his boastful tweets.
Got any clips of it?
I've heard he has called various law firms and told them not to hire his students he didn't like or that may have voiced questionable views on Israel.
Please do expand on this. Sounds like something we would like to know.....
Please do expand on this. Sounds like something we would like to know.....
I've followed him since the mid 80s and he's been involved in all sorts of drama ranging from plagiarism cases to getting involved with an underaged teenager to bullying people who dared criticize his actions to going after people because they criticized Israel.
https://abovethelaw.com/2015/01/alan-dershowitzs-accuser-swears-by-her-story-of-sexual-misconduct/
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-30705703
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/arts/12tenu.html
https://mondoweiss.net/2015/01/virulent-dershowitz-advocate/
No apologies necessary. He's such a useless cretin that if you don't laugh, you'll end up weeping or depressed. Heck i would take Liverpool winning the league and a scouse lover tag forever if it meant he gets impeached.No just tired and missed the mocking part. I guess I was triggered. Goodnight and apologies for missing the irony.
I'd bet everything I have it's going to be a variation of "anyone could have impregnated that whore"
The vandalising incident is exactly what Ben Shapiro means (and in this case rightly so) when he tells the left "this is what got you Trump and you don't see it". The same as Robert De Niro shouting "feck Trump" in front of an Trump-hating audience. Idiots.
It annoys me that people mix up “excellent debater” with “purveyor of salient, logical, factual points”.
Just because he can construct a clever counter-argument, is articulate and has developed a technique and tactic which is essentially akin to verbal slight of hand does not mean he’s a source of truth.
By all means study his techniques but completely disregard the content because 99.9% of it is absolute guff.
Can't people just give Trump the respect he deserves? Haters gonna hate.
Can't people just give Trump the respect he deserves? Haters gonna hate.
Alan doesn't have all the facts. Avenatti has every last detail.From 6 minutes in, who's right? Legally has Michael Avenatti violated an ethical code by having a conversation with Cohen without his lawyer's approval, as Alan D. claims? Both seem so sure. Who's right?
Alan doesn't have all the facts. Avenatti has every last detail.
Quoted from one the the state bar websites
"During the representation of a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter"
This is what Alan is talking about. But what Alan clearly has no idea on is the case isn't between Clifford and Cohen. Avenatti's case is Clifford v Trump. Cohen is only a witness to the case. To which he has pled the fifth. Alan used to be highly respected but he clearly has lost the plot. I have never taken a law course in my life and it took me 2 mins to figure that out. Avenatti has his i's dotted and his t's crossed.
Cohen as far as I know doesn't have any lawsuit against him at this time. Avenatti can talk to him about matters related to stormy's case vs Trump once Cohen is fine with it. Remember Cohen has tapes that could be instrumental to the case (of which he is not a party of)
Not sure if this reply was for me?Avenatti butting heads with Dershowitz was inevitable imo. Both are brash in yer face types and both talk a big game for their respective sides of the debate on TV.
Avenatti clearly has political ambitions and is using each chance he gets to attack the likes of Cohen, Trump, Giuliani, and now Dershowitz to make himself look like Giulliani did when he used the fame he received for crushing organized crime back in the 80s to springboard into a political career. Avenatti is basically doing the same thing and so anyone who criticizes him (like Dershowitz) will be seen as a threat.
As for Dershowitz, he is a known Israel hawk and has clearly made a tacit deal with the (orange) devil whereby he is running interference for Trump in the media on all things Russia as long as Trump continues to be pro-Israel, move the Embassy to Jerusalem and generally be pro-Bibi, and also continue to promote Dershowitz's book.
So in the end it was inevitable that both Avenatii and Dershowitz would one day butt heads to protect their respective political interests.
Not sure if this reply was for me?
The GOP acted in the same way under Obama, tbh.
Not necessarily to you...your post just happened to be the nearest post quotable.![]()
As for Dershowitz, he is a known Israel hawk and has clearly made a tacit deal with the (orange) devil whereby he is running interference for Trump in the media on all things Russia as long as Trump continues to be pro-Israel, move the Embassy to Jerusalem and generally be pro-Bibi, and also continue to promote Dershowitz's book.
I'm confused by your post. Being a hawk refers to adopting a combative approach does it not?