clarkydaz
Full Member
why do people still allow her to speak publicly?
why do people still allow her to speak publicly?
Why is there a need for an individual to claim disability benefits if they are now fit to work?
Tbh the google/YouTube gave the labour only 10,000 and suddenly the labour did a u turn on its digital tax service policy. Labour also had a donation from a oil guy before it backed on its climate policy.I'm surprised Bloomberg donated to Labour.
The optics aren't great, but parties discussing policy with practitioners in the industry it covers is not unusual.
The company that made the donation was the only non-financial company at the meeting where financial policy was discussed as well, so hardly a smoking gun.
Pretty much. Things will continue to get worse all of over the world but history tends to show dystopian shite doesn’t last forever.Our politicians in the West are so myopic. They are not interested in dealing with the systemic failures which are going to cause seismic fractures in society in the coming decades. Falling birthrates, people living longer and requiring more medical care, the spiralling debt crisis and reliance on the dollar as the world's currency, climate change, a disenfranchised youth, the ever-widening gap between the richest and the poorest, the inevitable hegemony of the East... I could go on. Instead it's business as usual, more of the same, let's just kick the can down the road.
I'm as optimistic a person as you could meet. Life is wonderful and I find joy in the simple things. By most metrics, we've never had it so good. But I'm also a student of history and when we get circumstances like those I mentioned in the first paragraph all happening at once, there's only one outcome that I can see. Revolution. Might not necessarily be violent, might not be sudden, but something has to give. And the longer things carry on as they are, the more likely it is that it will be sudden and it will be violent.
I always assume they're just aping any Tory stance change when Labour do their latest policy U-turn.Tbh the google/YouTube gave the labour only 10,000 and suddenly the labour did a u turn on its digital tax service policy. Labour also had a donation from a oil guy before it backed on its climate policy.
Tbh the thing that is most surprising is how cheap these donations are. Doesn’t seem to take a lot of cash.
Probably. Tbh if we takeaway the parties the likes of Starmer, Sunak, Reeves and Hunt are pretty much all the same person. I think in the case of Reeves and Hunt they studied the same course at the same uni.I always assume they're just aping any Tory stance change when Labour do their latest policy U-turn.
Probably. Tbh if we takeaway the parties the likes of Starmer, Sunak, Reeves and Hunt are pretty much all the same person. I think in the case of Reeves and Hunt they studied the same course at the same uni.
I guess it’s easier for the donators at least!
We need publicly funded elections and political parties, and to make these kinds of donations illegal.
It is depressing that Reeves and Hunt could do a face/off swap and no-one would notice.Probably. Tbh if we takeaway the parties the likes of Starmer, Sunak, Reeves and Hunt are pretty much all the same person. I think in the case of Reeves and Hunt they studied the same course at the same uni.
I guess it’s easier for the donators at least!
We do. And organisations should be unable to donate as a 'block', trade unionists should be balloted as to whether a portion of their subs goes to donation (they used to be) and for companies each and every shareholder should be balloted and any donation be in proportion to their holding. With a maximum per individual, and a low maximum at that.We need publicly funded elections and political parties, and to make these kinds of donations illegal.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...hip-says-LIZ-TRUSS-blistering-new-memoir.htmlPart of the problem we faced was a distinct shortage of expert voices supporting our agenda.
She seems genuinely obsessed with Reaganomics-style supply side reform aka trickle down economics.I don't believe Truss has any ideology whatsoever, she's just plain fecking thick.
Michelle Donalan hides the true extent of the public spending on her libel losses by tens of thousands of pounds.
Ndaim Zahawi pays a >£20m FINE for tax evasion, meaning that was a fraction of what he owed.
Johnson spent hundreds of thousands on his Covid defence.
Johnson spent £40m on a bridge and never even broke ground.
But hark!!! Angela Rayner might have skipped a £1500 capital gains tax bill!
Fecking Liz Truss everywhere today promoting her new book and spouting shite and fecking media like the BBC give her a platform to spout her shite. Fecking sick of her.
She's off her tits.
Iain Dale can feck off loading his questions like that.
Ms Truss told the BBC's Political Editor Chris Mason that plans to phase out smoking over time were "unconservative".
She said "we should absolutely protect children from damage and danger while they are developing decision-making capabilities", but added: "We're a free country.
"We shouldn't be telling people not to smoke and I worry about where it will lead."
That quote...:The excerpt is quite interesting. Certainly underlines how blinkered Truss was by ideology and how paranoid she was about her colleagues.
The dig at Gove having 'anti-growth instincts' made me laugh.
'We didn't know Britain was sitting on a financial tinderbox': Who's to blame for the bond market meltdown that torpedoed her premiership? Everyone, says LIZ TRUSS, in her blistering new memoir
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...hip-says-LIZ-TRUSS-blistering-new-memoir.html
Part of the problem we faced was a distinct shortage of expert voices supporting our agenda.
That’s a remarkable line. Astonishing really.That quote...:
...really underlines the problem. She didn't see this as overwhelming evidence that all the intelligence suggested that her ideas were terrible, but as an anti-Conservative conspiracy.
She's off her tits.
Harsh on @PexboI see the fecking thicko is back doing the rounds. Deluded twat.
Two headline articles on the BBC website. Two. One for her support of Trump and another from the political editor discussing six key points from her new book. As if her opinion on anything should carry any fecking weight whatsoever. She is the worst PM this country has had in modern times, and that is an impressive feat considering the competition.I see the fecking thicko is back doing the rounds. Deluded twat.
Two headline articles on the BBC website. Two. One for her support of Trump and another from the political editor discussing six key points from her new book. As if her opinion on anything should carry any fecking weight whatsoever. She is the worst PM this country has had in modern times, and that is an impressive feat considering the competition.
He published the book! He doesn’t operate it day to day, but he still co-owns Biteback Publishing.