South Korea would stage some World Cup soccer matches in North Korea if it wins the right to host sport’s most-watched tournament in 2022.
South Korea is competing against the U.S., Australia, Qatar and Japan, with whom it co-hosted the 2002 edition. Soccer governing body FIFA’s executive committee will announce its decision on the 2018 and 2022 hosts Dec. 2. The matches in the two countries were among disclosures contained in a summary of bidders for the 2018 and 2022 tournaments written by FIFA’s technical panel and obtained by Bloomberg News.
“The Korea Republic’s bid-hosting concept presents the idea of holding some matches of the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Korea DPR,” according to the summary, which will be released tomorrow.
The summary also says the U.S. bid lacks the government backing required by FIFA, and Qatar’s effort is hampered by temperatures that can reach more than 46 degrees centigrade (115 degrees Fahrenheit).
The Korean peninsula has been divided since civil war ended with a stalemate in 1953.
Tensions between the two nations grew this year after a torpedo attack on a South Korean warship killed 46 sailors. While South Korea said an investigation proved North Korea launched the attack, the North Koreans denied responsibility.
North Korea qualified for this year’s World Cup in South Africa, the first time in 44 years the communist nation played at the tournament. It failed to win a match, although it was tied 0-0 with Brazil at halftime of its opening game. It lost 2- 1, then was drubbed 7-0 by Portugal before losing its final match 3-0 to Ivory Coast.
Recent Performances
South Korea made it to the round of 16 in South Africa, where it lost 2-1 to eventual semifinalist Uruguay. It had beaten Greece 2-0, lost 4-1 to Argentina and drawn 2-2 with Nigeria.
North Korea had its best performance at the World Cup in 1966 in England when it got to the quarterfinals, beating Italy 1-0 in the group stage. South Korea was fourth as co-host in 2002.
The U.S. needs to get government financial backing for its bid, FIFA said.
“FIFA’s legal risk appears to be medium,” the report says. “The necessary government support has not been documented as neither the government guarantees, the government declaration, nor the government legal statement have been provided in compliance with FIFA’s requirements for government documents.”
American Bid
The FIFA inspection team, which visited the U.S. between 6 and 9 Sept., said the U.S. government had however “considerable experience in supporting the hosting and staging of major sports events and proven its willingness to make material concessions. The U.S. government has “expressed its intention to enact the necessary legislation by 1 June 2013,” it added.
U.S. bid committee Executive Director David Downs said all of the government guarantees have been signed, but were modified because of U.S. law.
“We have been in conversations with FIFA about this and they are comfortable with the situation,” Downs said.
The U.S., which has budgeted $661.2 million to stage the 2022 World Cup and a warm up event a year earlier, isn’t the only candidate to have potential problems marked out.
Qatar’s suitability has been questioned in a number of areas. The Gulf state has proposed spending $3 billion on air- conditioned stadiums. That hasn’t stopped FIFA questioning the wisdom of hosting sport’s most event watched event in the desert.
Summer Heat
“The fact the competition is planned in June/July, the two hottest months of the year in this region, has to be considered as a potential health risk for players, officials, the FIFA family and spectators,” the report said.
“You can air condition a stadium, but I don’t see how you can air-condition an entire country,” Chuck Blazer, a U.S. official who’ll have a vote on where the competition is staged, said in an article published today by the Wall Street Journal.
The committee also raised concerns about the suitability of two joint bids for the 2018 World Cup proposed by Spain/Portugal and Netherlands/Belgium. FIFA President Sepp Blatter has said he isn’t in favor of joint offers and the inspection team wrote they “pose challenges” from an operational perspective.
Those two bids are battling offers proposals from England and Russia in an all European competition to stage the World Cup after Brazil in 2014.
Russia is trying to host the event for the first time. Its lack of transport infrastructure was highlighted by the committee.
“Any delay in the completion the transport projects could impact on FIFA’s tournament operations and the proposed installation of temporary facilities could impose a high-cost burden,” the report said.
English Broadcasting
England will have to suspend a national law that guarantees that some sporting events including the World Cup are shown only on free-to-air television because it “adversely affects the free and unrestricted exploitation of media rights.”
The race to host the World Cup has been overshadowed by the suspension of two of the 24 officials who decide where the competition is staged. They were temporarily banned while FIFA probes allegations that they told undercover reporters their votes could be bought. FIFA’s ethics panel announces its decisions on Nigeria’s Amos Adamu and Tahiti’s Reynald Temarii in two days.