Regulus Arcturus Black
Full Member
No. Luis Enrique gets plenty of credit for what's he's done. .
Does he? heard his job's on shakey ground.
No. Luis Enrique gets plenty of credit for what's he's done. .
I personally dont think that Luis gets much credit for what he is doing when its going right or wrong at Barcelona . I sometimes forget who manages them. All the press talk about is MSN from where i am siiting. When people speak about top 5 managers in the world hes not even mentioned as #6. Would you want him at our club as a manager?No. Luis Enrique gets plenty of credit for what's he's done. No surprise as he's won the treble.
It's not easy managing elite clubs. Ask David Moyes!
Owners, presidents, agents, player rebellions, press pressure. All of that has to be managed before you even deal with the football.
Zidane has done a better job dealing with all that than a lot of Madrid managers.
No. Luis Enrique gets plenty of credit for what's he's done. No surprise as he's won the treble.
It's not easy managing elite clubs. Ask David Moyes!
Owners, presidents, agents, player rebellions, press pressure. All of that has to be managed before you even deal with the football.
Zidane has done a better job dealing with all that than a lot of Madrid managers.
What were the different tactics he tried to get them to do this?Luis Enrique is another example of what is needed to manage some teams imho.
When he came, he wanted everyone to work his ass off, tried different tactics, tried to reinvent the wheel, until he just "embraced" his squad and did the most logical thing, manage the egos and use a proven formula
What were the different tactics he tried to get them to do this?
What were the different tactics he tried to get them to do this?
I recall people calling him "andamios" right when he was appointed, I guess he tried to implement that xD
As for the tactics I don't remember quite well what he did but the most noticeable thing was confronting some of the top players like Messi, then Luis Enrique had to give in but he managed to make Messi play wide and Suárez in his best position.
Interesting, thanks.He wanted to rotate players (subbing Messi, not putting him or Neymar in the starting XI against Real Sociedad, something that almost costed him the job), he asked more work from the front three, and if I remember correctly he tried Messi as the false 9 while Suarez was playing in the right, he used a 3-4-3 with 3 CB's against PSG in the group phase with the top seed on the line (a game that I at least think was the start of the transition from tiki-taka to our more direct football that season) and had some faith in Montoya ahead of Alves until it became obvius that he wasn't good enough
Basically, Zidane earned the trust of his players and we could say he convinced them to rest in some games (one year ago he said the BBC would play every game they were fit to play) and now he is in a better position. Lucho took the joob with the axe trying to "hack" a team that wasn't working and when he stopped using the axe he found success, Zidane started with a more friendly approach, he took some concepts that Benitez wanted to use but couldn't (Casemiro) and managed better the situation, some other things the team still had from Ancelotti returned and the players obviusly respect him as a player and as a personality.
I still don't know what ceiling Zidane has in other areas, but he seems a smart manager in his squad management and even with a historic unbeaten run you don't see him claiming credit or fame. That's important and until we get to see how he manages his first first big crisis in the team he looks like the perfect fit for that bench
No one knows his ceiling, but there are hints what he might have in mind stylistically.I still don't know what ceiling Zidane has in other areas, but he seems a smart manager in his squad management and even with a historic unbeaten run you don't see him claiming credit or fame.
Jose won it in 2011/12Jose won your only league title in 10 (??) years..
Didn't Ancelloti only win one major trophy as well?Jose won it in 2011/12
We did it back to back in 06/07 and 07/08
So no not 10 years lol
He only managed to win one major trophy in 3 years at Madrid, that is a failure. Shuster and Capello arguably had better stints in shorter times. Ancelotti managed to do better in 2 years despite going a whole season without winning a trophy.
In 2 seasons, not 3 and he won us the 10th, but the lack of trophies is why he was fired.Didn't Ancelloti only win one major trophy as well?
Oh it wasn't a dig at Zidane in any way. I was genuinely curious, as I haven't watched much of Real this season.Did you see how many players we have had out at times? Have a look at the starters missing against Sevilla for instance. It's not like he is playing the same 11 20+ games in a row ala Ancelotti.
He was a failure, highest paid manager in the world at the time, given more power than any Real Madrid manger in history, they sacked the Sporting Director role for him and gave him full power over transfers and he lost the locker room, much like he did at Chelsea and was only able to deliver the La Liga in 3 full seasons, while getting spanked by Barcelona at the same time.One major trophy in three years against an All Time Great Barca, and he's a failure.
Evidence of player power evident across different managers, yet only he's to blame.
...HOW?![]()
this is driving me nuts. Why do people keep calling Luis Enrique, just Enrique? You are aware that's just his second name, right? If you want to shorten it, call him Luis. Or Lucho
He was a failure, highest paid manager in the world at the time, given more power than any Real Madrid manger in history, they sacked the Sporting Director role for him and gave him full power over transfers and he lost the locker room, much like he did at Chelsea and was only able to deliver the La Liga in 3 full seasons, while getting spanked by Barcelona at the same time.
That is a huge failure.
One liga in 3 years is not bad but not great.One major trophy in three years against an All Time Great Barca, and he's a failure.
Evidence of player power evident across different managers, yet only he's to blame.
...HOW?![]()
When you put it that way, fair enough. Someone was putting him alongside Fergie etc and that was just bizarreWe didn't have any of those in our Bench today was Coentrao, Kovacic, Carvajal and Enzo Zidane and I don't remember who else but Benzema was the only player capable of providing something upfront. We had Mariano upfront alongside Morata, Asensio, Lucas Vázquez, Nacho and freaking Danilo.
What I mean is it has a merit and surprisingly Zidane is doing such an amazing job we have to applaud him so far. I'm not saying he's already the best manager in the world, I'd still rate Mourinho higher because of his records and career. It's also very likely Zidane won't be able to replicate this with another team, even if it was Barcelona or Bayern Munich, and it's more like Madrid being the perfect club for him and Zidane being the perfect manager for Real Madrid. It really works this well and there's no need for him to pursue a career elsewhere or to look for another manager right now.
What a daft thing to get upset over. In places all around the world you refer to people formally by their surname given you're obviously not pals with "Lucho".this is driving me nuts. Why do people keep calling Luis Enrique, just Enrique? You are aware that's just his second name, right? If you want to shorten it, call him Luis. Or Lucho
That someone also uses "lol" in posts. The standard these days.When you put it that way, fair enough. Someone was putting him alongside Fergie etc and that was just bizarre
This seems like a Spanish thing. Managers and players are almost always referred to by their surnames here. It's an awfully bizarre thing to get worked up over anyway.
Isn't that very common? Did you think mourinho, Wenger, Klopp and all are the managers' first names?
What a daft thing to get upset over. In places all around the world you refer to people formally by their surname given you're obviously not pals with "Lucho".
I guess that the majority of people who aren't very familiar with Spanish names, do not know that Enrique is not his surname, but in fact it is just his second name.this is driving me nuts. Why do people keep calling Luis Enrique, just Enrique? You are aware that's just his second name, right? If you want to shorten it, call him Luis. Or Lucho
Agree on everything you said except he wasn't a failure IMO, but you might see it differently. I just can't see anyone topping that Barca side, maybe late 80s Milan.
The failure comes in the lack of challenge by the 3rd season. When people say "topping the Barca team", by the 3rd season they were 15 points behind which with the team he had, isn't even a Real effortOne liga in 3 years is not bad but not great.
I also think that his time in Madrid has been a failure, for many reasons but especially because of the football style, the agressiveness that he promoted and the division that created among the fans.
Since when is 78 points "close to 100"?Juande Ramos and Pelle had Madrid getting close to 100 points!
It's surprising that he hasn't been exposed yet. Also seems like he's rode his luck a lot throughout his tenure.
It's surprising that he hasn't been exposed yet. Also seems like he's rode his luck a lot throughout his tenure.
OMDHe's made this Real side unbelievably resilient, they keep coming back and back and back and back.