Ramshock
CAF Pilib De Brún Translator

I think you're going all scouse on us, and claiming it's a kangeroo court where you were gaoled for having sex.Yep. Guess it's similar legalese to stuff like: 'I welcome the enquiry into these allegations of kangaroo sex which I'm accused of....etc'
Not that I've ever been accused of having sex with kangaroos, you understand.
I think you're going all scouse on us, and claiming it's a kangeroo court where you were gaoled for having sex.
We have suffered a lot of hardship as a city and as a club, and we come together when times are tough. That is not self pity, that is togetherness - community. You'll Never Walk Alone is more than a phrase to us.
You do realise you're on a Sunderland board?
Where the lies come from:
In the 2006 case of claimed racial abuse by Steve Finnan, the accusation was levelled at Finnan by a deaf fan who claimed he lip-read the racial slur. Evra declined to complain. A rather odd thing to do for a man with a supposed inclination to play the race card, I’m sure you’ll agree.
In the case with involving Chelsea groundsman, Tony Bethell, it was Mike Phelan and Richard Hartis of Manchester United’s coaching staff who claimed they heard the abuse. As the FA report says “The two witnesses who say they heard those words directed by Mr Bethell at Mr Evra are the Manchester United first team coach Mr Mike Phelan and the goalkeeping coach Mr Richard Hartis.” It later goes on to say “Even if we disregard the fact that Mr Evra has never claimed to have heard such a remark on that day, it is notable that there were several other people far nearer to Mr Bethell at the critical point in time than were either Mr Phelan or Mr Hartis.”
So in reality, Evra accused neither Finnan nor Bethell of a racist remark. The claims were made by others. These are the cold, hard facts.
Boss from Sunderland [QUOTE=Scouser Scumbag I hope #MUNICH happens again and Evra's head fecking rolls like Duncan's fanny head you fecking inbred shithouses.[/QUOTE said:best fans in the world, they are a classy bunch eh
Good stuff.Fantastic topic on a Sunderland forum by a scouse.
Suarez cleared of all charges!! - RTG Sunderland Message Boards
Then around page 14 for a follow up.
Good to see Sunderland fan's seeing logic too.
This response is why you are quickly becoming one of the most detested sets of people in this country. Everything is always against you and its just you lot who suffer.
How come Evertonians never whinge or cry on like you bunch of fairies ?
The fckin lot of you want to grow a set of balls and man up. When our players act like wankers, we're embarrased and question whether they should play for us again AS THEY"VE LET US ALL DOWN; CLUB; FANS; CITY. When your players let you down, it's someone else's fault, always.
Your club has the collective age of a spoilt eight year old.
Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.
We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.
The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.
LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.
It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.
Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.
He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.
It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.
It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.
We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
Fantastic topic on a Sunderland forum by a scouse.
Suarez cleared of all charges!! - RTG Sunderland Message Boards
Then around page 14 for a follow up.
Good to see Sunderland fan's seeing logic too.
Great thread that.
Classier than sheep I suppose.In my culture, having sex with kangaroos means that I'm not a racist.
To be fair I thought he'd cried wolf before, the Chelsea verdict doesn't do him any favours.The number of genuine media outlets reporting these fictional previous racism accusations as gospel is mind-blowing.
Liverpool Football Club have played them all like a fiddle.
Why is everyone looking at Sunderland forums, is there some connection I'm missing?
Classier than sheep I suppose.
Pah, you can't afford a lawyer (nor I) - you'll have to engage me in hand-to-hand combat (no wombat).
Why is everyone looking at Sunderland forums, is there some connection I'm missing?
Yep. Guess it's similar legalese to stuff like: 'I welcome the enquiry into these allegations of kangaroo sex which I'm accused of....etc'
Not that I've ever been accused of having sex with kangaroos, you understand.
Other fans for once seem to be fully behind us on this.
I wonder what I'd think if I was a Liverpool fan, because I don't normally mind RAWK at all, but I find the outrage at this baffling.
The LFC statement is just weird. I genuinely don't get it, and it seems it's caused quite a stir on twitter as well, with journalists from the DM and Guardian mocking it.
I just can't comprehend it, I am interested in the findings of the enquiry to see if they have any justification.
The adjudicating panel was led by QC Paul Goulding but it is hard not to believe that he received powerful underpinning from his colleague Denis Smith.
A magnificent centre-half for Stoke, and a manager who knew both success and failure, Smith went into the hearing under the bizarre suggestion that an old professional connection with Sir Alex Ferguson's son, Darren, might make him a less than impartial arbiter. For anyone who knew him, the theory might have been etched crudely in crayon rather than tweeted. Indeed, Smith's long, injury-strewn but superbly indefatigable involvement in the hard end of professional football made him eminently qualified to note the difference between nuances of language, and intention, and the realities of serious provocation and insult.
Even so the long days of deliberation suggest a near forensic examination of the claims and counter-claims.
I've just read the Liverpool statement.
I can't believe they're still trying to take pot shots at Evra, and they're using the Sepp Blatter defence by trying to associate him with black friends/players etc.
What on earth were they thinking? I'm almost embarrassed for them!
Fantastic topic on a Sunderland forum by a scouse.
Suarez cleared of all charges!! - RTG Sunderland Message Boards
Then around page 14 for a follow up.
Good to see Sunderland fan's seeing logic too.
I'm genuinely interested to know what the sensible 'pool fans think of this. You'd imagine at least some Liverpool fans are aware everyone is mocking their crackpot libellous statement. The ones who proclaimed it the greatest thing written since John Lennon died have been left with little choice but to champion it like fecking loons, but I'm sure there are some that see it as the RAWKish paranoid rant it is?