I just saw it on Fox.
A link to this? It would be amazing if someone did film the impact at that kind of altitude.
RIP to all the victims.
Absolutely mental if it was brought down by the military.
Where you see that?Guy at the crash site showing passports of the deceased... Unbelievable.
Where you see that?
Where you see that?
BBC showing Youtube footage that includes passport covers and they are blurring parts of pictures presumably due to bodies.
Grim stuff.
My god, I just saw pictures of the dead bodies. Just horrifying.
Please don't tell me news websites are posting that!
I was reading the DM yesterday and they had a picture of a dead woman in a ditch. It was fecking despicable.
Please don't tell me news websites are posting that!
Christ! I didn't think a paper like the DM would stoop that low.
I don't see the problem with not censoring pictures of dead people in disasters. As long as people are warned they are graphic and have to confirm they're over 18.
I guess they thought it was ok because the poor woman was a foreigner.
It's somewhat inconsiderate that some people may find out their loved ones died by seeing their guts spewed out on a field somewhere in rural Ukraine.I don't see the problem with not censoring pictures of dead people in disasters. As long as people are warned they are graphic and have to confirm they're over 18.
I don't see the problem with not censoring pictures of dead people in disasters. As long as people are warned they are graphic and have to confirm they're over 18.
Distraught brothers, sisters, mothers, lovers and so on won't really be in a state of mind to just avoid it. They're going to, rather understandably, be clinging to every desperate hope they can that their loved ones missed the flight or that it's a different one. They're going to want to know as much as they possibly can.
A common mans life isn't worth that amount of trouble. Remember that this is less than 1 in a million case.Civil airplanes must have some tactical defence like the air force one.
That's the most bizarre thing I've seen anyone suggest here. The state should, under no circumstance, stop grieving people from searching for information. That's a pretty surefire way to completely feck them emotionally.So your saying if people choose to look through graphic photos, as a "rather understandable" coping method by trying to "know as much as they can". Then people shouldn't be free to do so, and the state should stop them doing this?
This is not going to end well.Ukrainians claim they have intercepted phone calls between pro-Russian separatists and Russian intelligence about the shoot down of the plane.
Yea, Dutch guy on fb. His friends were wishing him good vacation at first and then heard the news. Horrible stuff...And there's a supposed picture of someone on the flight that uploaded a photo of the plane in case it went missing.
CNN aviation analyst and pilot Miles O'Brien said he thinks it would be difficult to mistake the plane for a military or hostile aircraft.
"A civilian airliner at that level, at that flight path, would be very difficult to mistake for something that has hostile intent," he said.
The wreckage path, O'Brien said, will reveal a lot. If a plane breaks up in midair, which is likely what would happen in a missile strike, there would be a large swath of wreckage, he said, but if it breaks down due to mechanical failure, the debris field would be more concentrated.
That's the most bizarre thing I've seen anyone suggest here. The state should, under no circumstance, stop grieving people from searching for information. That's a pretty surefire way to completely feck them emotionally.
I never said that or anything resembling that.That was my point. you said people would want to use the pictures to see if their loved ones were amongst the dead but you initially said pictures should be published.