The Spurs thread

That's a change from your previous comment: "It was obvious he wasn't going to stay at Spurs." ... as if his departure was already announced and imminent.

And what if it's later, rather than sooner? What if Pochettino sticks around to build a dynasty at Spurs, takes his young squad on for several more years, takes us into the new stadium in 2 years from now and then beyond? Ever consider that?

The way that some posters talk you'd imagine that poor little Spurs are a minnow surrounded by dozens and dozens of vastly bigger clubs ... until you realise of course that Spurs will be in the global top 10 income-wise within 2 years, and that's even before our world-class new stadium opens.

So who are all these clubs that could shortly take Pochettino?

Man. Utd? No chance Poch will want to take on an inferior squad just to play in the EL again.
PSG? No chance in the near future - especially as Poch has also said that there is no real domestic competition in the French League.
Arsenal? No chance + have Wenger in any case
Chelski? No chance + have Conte in any case
Liverpool - have Klopp.
Man. City - have Pep

That essentially leaves RM, Barca and B.Munich

He could probably get us 2-3 players which would make us much superior to Spurs. Hell, he could just take Alli and Kane with him and you'd be back to mid-table.
 
OK. I'm done with this discussion. I'll simply reiterate the basis point (below) and leave you guys to make false claims about invented numbers, whilst simultaneously sticking your heads in the sands and trying hard to pretend that nothing has changed and nothing will ever change, because the 'elite' Prem clubs must always and forever, due to economics, dominate the top 4.

Overall, during the recent Prem era, and generally speaking in terms of the league, Chelski have declined, so have Man. Utd and so have Liverpool ... whilst in the upper third of the league Spurs have been the one team that has generally improved, as evidenced by 3 top 4 finishes in the last 6 seasons including this one.

That's me done with this, so knock yourself out from here on.
If Liverpool are declining why have you tipped them for top four next season? That's going against your trend surely.
 
Quite amazing that he cannot see the trend of finishing top 4 three times in 2011-2014 period but only once since then. It's like he can see three year periods only for United.
 
Also, the last three seasons - Leicester with higher league position twice. Last 1 season - Leicester higher in all of them. (Unless they somehow lose three remaining games)
 
Quite amazing that he cannot see the trend of finishing top 4 three times in 2011-2014 period but only once since then. It's like he can see three year periods only for United.
Amazing also recent Premier League era by his definition started just 3 years ago conveniently with SAF's retirement.
 
It's the first time you are in top 4 since 2012. Current three year period is worse than the previous one where you made top 4 twice. Either you get the trend or ignore it and live in your bubble.

As I've already said, I've compared the last 6 years for Spurs with the previous 6 years = three top-4 finishes compared to none.

It really is beyond stupid to try and maintain that Spurs have not made considerable progress in recent times ... and not just on the pitch.
 
If Liverpool are declining why have you tipped them for top four next season? That's going against your trend surely.

Trends can be changed - they are not set-in-stone predictors. Klopp's appointment was a game-changer.
 
Last edited:
He could probably get us 2-3 players which would make us much superior to Spurs. Hell, he could just take Alli and Kane with him and you'd be back to mid-table.

He couldn't. And he isn't going to United in any case. You've got the circus coming to town instead.
 
Quite amazing that he cannot see the trend of finishing top 4 three times in 2011-2014 period but only once since then. It's like he can see three year periods only for United.

I've already compared the three-year period for both clubs. It's a period in which Spurs will likely have achieved their highest ever Prem finish and will have finished above United twice. Trying to twist that into a Spurs decline is highly imaginative, but clearly stupid.
 
Spurs are better than us at this moment but it is going to be interesting to see what they will look to improve on in the summer. What are their problem positions?

They've had a fully fit first 11 basically all season with every player at the top of their game and are still just 10 points ahead of what i'd consider our worst ever PL season. This is despite us having multiple long term injuries and a lack of quality in attack from the outset.

The way i see it, Spurs are a good bet to finish above us next season but i don't see them doing that much better than this year, us on the other hand have far more potential for improvement but are dependent on a lot of unknowns (manager, signings, recovery of players like Shaw, Schweinsteiger).
 
Trends can be changed - they are not set-in-stone predictors. Klopp's appointment was a game-changer.
So those thinking a new manager at Utd will see a change in fortune are not worthy of the scorn you're attempting to pour on them.
 
So those thinking a new manager at Utd will see a change in fortune are not worthy of the scorn you're attempting to pour on them.

What scorn? Simply saying that United have declined, which I imagine most United fans also see, doesn't amount to scorn.

A new manager may well see an improvement in fortune - have I said different? I just happen to think - subject perhaps to later revision depending on which players come and go at which clubs - that it won't be enough to propel you into the top 4.

Liverpool have Klopp, who'll now have the summer he didn't get last time to work with his squad. Spurs have Pochettino, with a squad that is likely to improve further given the young average age. City have Pep ... and even without him it's difficult to see them dropping out of the top 4. Arsenal will likely as usual do enough to finish top 4. And then there's Chelski, who can't be ruled out, even tho' I think you'll finish above them.

United will face another summer of upheaval - new manager most likely, who'll want to make fair few changes in player personnel no doubt, and a new playing style to impose. These things take time to gel. And with such stiff competition for top 4 there'll probably be little such time to spare.

I also think that, with Mourinho, you'll revert again to trying to buy your way out of trouble, neglecting the youth development and player scouting that IMO would be the better way forward.
 
What scorn? Simply saying that United have declined, which I imagine most United fans also see, doesn't amount to scorn.

A new manager may well see an improvement in fortune - have I said different? I just happen to think - subject perhaps to later revision depending on which players come and go at which clubs - that it won't be enough to propel you into the top 4.

Liverpool have Klopp, who'll now have the summer he didn't get last time to work with his squad. Spurs have Pochettino, with a squad that is likely to improve further given the young average age. City have Pep ... and even without him it's difficult to see them dropping out of the top 4. Arsenal will likely as usual do enough to finish top 4. And then there's Chelski, who can't be ruled out, even tho' I think you'll finish above them.

United will face another summer of upheaval - new manager most likely, who'll want to make fair few changes in player personnel no doubt, and a new playing style to impose. These things take time to gel. And with such stiff competition for top 4 there'll probably be little such time to spare.

I also think that, with Mourinho, you'll revert again to trying to buy your way out of trouble, neglecting the youth development and player scouting that IMO would be the better way forward.
You're ridiculing the notion that Utd could finish above Spirs with a new manager. What else would you call it? Will Klopp's new signings not need time to gel too?
 
You're ridiculing the notion that Utd could finish above Spirs with a new manager. What else would you call it? Will Klopp's new signings not need time to gel too?

Ridiculing? I'm simply saying that I don't think it will happen and explaining why.

As for Klopp, yes any new signing will need time to gel, but the rest of the current squad won't so much as he's been working with them for a while and it's starting to show.
 
I honestly don't know why a Spurs fan would spend so much time on a United board arguing points that are obviously going to be disagreed with. They've blown the best chance they'll have to win the league and the levels of smugness are sky high. It's odd.
 
You're ridiculing the notion that Utd could finish above Spirs with a new manager. What else would you call it? Will Klopp's new signings not need time to gel too?
In fairness, the post you're replying to, he doesn't even remotely ridicule the notion that United could finish above Spurs with a new manager. He's just stating that he doesn't think it's likely.
 
I honestly don't know why a Spurs fan would spend so much time on a United board arguing points that are obviously going to be disagreed with. They've blown the best chance they'll have to win the league and the levels of smugness are sky high. It's odd.
Denial. They have blown their golden chance and they know it. Admitting it hurts too much. So they come here and try to convince us spurs in the title race is the new norm, not a freak.

The absurdity of it all is that Leicester and Spurs have both surpassed us and a bunch of other teams this season to be where they are but spurs fans want us to believe we or others can't emulate their rise next season.
 
Really?

Griezmann = Kane
Koke = Eriksen
Carrasco = Lamela
Juanfran = Walker
Oliver < Ali
Gabi < Dembélé
Godín > Alderweireld
Luís > Rose
Giménez < Vertonghen (For now)
Oblak < Lloris
Dier = Saúl
Torres > Njie

Atlético have more depth in the striking department, but both are similar in terms of overall quality.
:lol: Just seen this
 
Are they any better than when Harry had them? Maybe slightly but not by much.

Overated certainly.
 
As I've already said, I've compared the last 6 years for Spurs with the previous 6 years = three top-4 finishes compared to none.

It really is beyond stupid to try and maintain that Spurs have not made considerable progress in recent times ... and not just on the pitch.
Yes but that's only if you take 6-year period where two previous CL qualifications were achieved by a completely different team. The current team has done worse which is evidenced by only 1 top 4 finish compared to 2 in the previous 3-year period. If you don't see the trend here, you are deluding yourself.
 
Really?

Griezmann = Kane
Koke = Eriksen
Carrasco = Lamela
Juanfran = Walker
Oliver < Ali
Gabi < Dembélé
Godín > Alderweireld
Luís > Rose
Giménez < Vertonghen (For now)
Oblak < Lloris
Dier = Saúl
Torres > Njie

Atlético have more depth in the striking department, but both are similar in terms of overall quality.
You haven't done Atlético justice there, they're in the semi-final of the champions league with one foot in the door of the final. They're clearly a far superior team to Spurs player for player and all, there's a few Spurs players that'd get in but this is massively underrating them.
 
I've already compared the three-year period for both clubs. It's a period in which Spurs will likely have achieved their highest ever Prem finish and will have finished above United twice. Trying to twist that into a Spurs decline is highly imaginative, but clearly stupid.

Yep but compare 3 years now with previous 3 years of Spurs and you will see clear decline trend. It's true, do not live in denial.
 
fecking hell lads are you not bored of going over the same ground? :wenger:
 
if you take the last game each have played as a trend then man utd reached a cup final and spurs bottled a title shot. if you go back for two games, united won two from two where spurs won only one and bottled a title shot. trend comparison over.
 
In fairness, the post you're replying to, he doesn't even remotely ridicule the notion that United could finish above Spurs with a new manager. He's just stating that he doesn't think it's likely.
He has been throughout though. Harping on about trends. Rewind a few years and when Utd fans told him that Utd would likely finish above them and it was quite the opposite tack and that the past had no bearing on the future.
 
Why not? If we wanted them, we could sign them.

That's your delusion I'm afraid. The days of United signing any player we don't want to sell are long gone.

I suggest you go flash your cash at a club that's impressed by it ... or better still, develop a decent scouting system.
 
That's your delusion I'm afraid. The days of United signing any player we don't want to sell are long gone.

I suggest you go flash your cash at a club that's impressed by it ... or better still, develop a decent scouting system.
Nah, if we wanted it enough we'd still get it done.
 
He has been throughout though. Harping on about trends. Rewind a few years and when Utd fans told him that Utd would likely finish above them and it was quite the opposite tack and that the past had no bearing on the future.

Not correct. I've said that the past doesn't dictate the future, not that it has no bearing on it.
 
Nah, if we wanted it enough we'd still get it done.

Lol ... you've wasted plenty of time in the last few summers pursuing unobtainable players ... how come they didn't get done?
 
Or maybe United and Chelsea were actually amazing teams back then, you know getting to Champions League finals too and all of that. That's the standard English football needs to get back to, I mean don't get me wrong, this season has been refreshing to some extent, but it's been the result of a serious lack of quality in the league, not the other way around.

It's a really difficult argument this one because the quality improvement in the lower end of the Premier League has actually coincided with a decrease in the quality of the teams at the top of the table as well as a considerable improvement of Europe's biggest clubs outside of England.
 
Nah, if we wanted it enough we'd still get it done.

Purely out of interest if Utd could sign pretty much any player they want Probably apart from those at Real/Barca why have they got so many very ordinary players and why after Martial/DDG are their best players home grown kids?
 
I honestly don't know why a Spurs fan would spend so much time on a United board arguing points that are obviously going to be disagreed with. They've blown the best chance they'll have to win the league and the levels of smugness are sky high. It's odd.

Quite.

I've never anyone so bullish yet so obviously insecure about his team as Glaston.

It's all a bit transparent.
 
Purely out of interest if Utd could sign pretty much any player they want Probably apart from those at Real/Barca why have they got so many very ordinary players and why after Martial/DDG are their best players home grown kids?

A mix of things really.

I don't think Utd could sign pretty much any player they want.

That said we can compete at a top level. I don't consider players like, Blind, Luke Shaw, Scheinderlin, Herrara as ordinary players.

And having some of your best players coming through your academy is actually a pretty good thing.

There's a fag paper between the Spurs and United squads all fit IMO. Reflected in the fact we'll finish just a handful of points behind despite a much more debilitating round of injuries.
 
I honestly don't know why a Spurs fan would spend so much time on a United board arguing points that are obviously going to be disagreed with. They've blown the best chance they'll have to win the league and the levels of smugness are sky high. It's odd.
Some people seem to get off from riling up large groups on the internet. It doesn't really get any easier than supporters of a struggling United side. opposition fans have waited with baited breath for this.

I also think it's a defense mechanism. Spurs had the opportunity of a lifetime to win just a third league title. It's not over,but it's pretty close. That must hurt. All optimism about the future is properly laced with a lot of self doubt too. Who knows when they will win it again?it could be 1 year or it could very well be 50 again. That means for another year at least ,the ''Have you seem Spurs win the league''chants continue...as good as it is ,it's another trophyless season in Spurs history. For a big club,even Spurs will admit that they have had too many of those.

Maybe Glaston is right and this is the dawn of something great. But He has been so wrong before,he could be again. Liverpool fans were just as enthusiastic in 2014,things didn't turn out so well either.

Taking a pop at United deflects from that hurt. Again,it's exactly what pool fans did in the Summer of 14.
 
I don't really get this talk of 'Arsenal and Spurs are so poor they couldn't win the title in a season when the other big clubs did poorly'. Surely that reflects even worse on the big clubs that did do poorly?
 
Correct. Break up the Atlético back four and they are not the same players. It's their collective qualities that make them such a formidable lineup.

Koke, Griezmann, Correa, Oliver and Giménez are the players who I think would adapt at other top clubs.

Yeah, if you just put Vertonghen, Alderweireld, Danny Rose and Kyle Walker on any club they'd be world beaters. This has been proven time and time again throughout their illustrious careers.

Christ.