Probably a scouser.
Aye, they think there funny but in reality they can't handle the heat when somebody gives some stick back...........
Oooooooooooooooooooooooh. Who stole her handbag?
Claiming that Robbie Fowler should even make it into the top strikers of the last 20 years is hilariously ludicrous.
Fowler was an amazing player. The best finisher I will ever see.
Fowler was an amazing player. The best finisher I will ever see.
Not biased then Sam?
![]()
But Alastair is right, there have been much better in the last 20 years.
All subjective of course, TR. For me, there were very few better than Fowler in his prime.
Yeh Fowler was a top England based striker, but not on a world scale. A bit like Shearer, in the sense that he isn't rated that highly abroad.
Yeh Fowler was a top England based striker, but not on a world scale. A bit like Shearer, in the sense that he isn't rated that highly abroad.
I don't get this logic, A.
That he was or wasn't not highly rated abroad does not impact on his ability whatsoever. I would say of those 'abroad' who actually saw him play would have appreciated just how bloody good he was. Maybe it was about exposure.
On Shearer, those 'abroad' would have seen him as a archetypal Engliah striker. Shearer was much, much more than that.
Well I think it does. When a player is a magnificent talent, Europe tends to pick up on it. Like Rooney is rated highly in Europe and now Wilshere is starting to get recognised.
Players like Fowler and Shearer will be remembered fondly in England because they scored bucket-loads of goals and contributed massively to their team, and rightly so. Great players for their clubs. They just both lacked something which would make Europe sit up and take notice of them.
Your point about exposure is a good one - it might well have been the case that they did not get rated in Europe because they weren't seen enough. It's impossible to prove either way. But as far as I'm concerned, they were just on the second rung of strikers, behind your Ronaldos and Henrys of this world. That second rung is hardly a bad place to be though.
Fowler was a finisher, world class at it aswell. As an all round player he has pretty average. Everything about his finishing was class though, the cnut.
Robbie Fowler: better than Shearer, van Nistelrooy, Batistuta, Cantona, C.Ronaldo, Eto'o and as good as van Basten and Romario.
Well I think it does. When a player is a magnificent talent, Europe tends to pick up on it. Like Rooney is rated highly in Europe and now Wilshere is starting to get recognised.
Players like Fowler and Shearer will be remembered fondly in England because they scored bucket-loads of goals and contributed massively to their team, and rightly so. Great players for their clubs.They just both lacked something which would make Europe sit up and take notice of them.
Your point about exposure is a good one - it might well have been the case that they did not get rated in Europe because they weren't seen enough. It's impossible to prove either way. But as far as I'm concerned, they were just on the second rung of strikers, behind your Ronaldos and Henrys of this world. That second rung is hardly a bad place to be though.
Robbie Fowler: better than Shearer, van Nistelrooy, Batistuta, Cantona, C.Ronaldo, Eto'o and as good as van Basten and Romario.
in all fairness , this is bollocks
He was a very good striker, but nowhere near as good as any of those you mentioned.
I can't believe how some people can't see sarcasm at all.
In fairness typed sarcasm is a lot harder to spot.
In fairness typed sarcasm is a lot harder to spot.