Steven Seagull
Full Member
It is irrelevant if Levy isn't selling. If he's 100% sure that Modric isn't going for less than £40m and won't listen to offers lower than that, it's tough shit.
It is irrelevant if Levy isn't selling. If he's 100% sure that Modric isn't going for less than £40m and won't listen to offers lower than that, it's tough shit.
It's the same situation as that with Fabregas last summer; player agrees to stay one more year without kicking up and almighty fuss on the proviso he's allowed to leave a year later. No one is going to pay £40 for Modric so you'll have to let him go for what clubs are willing to pay (within reason)
Modric has never been a £40m player
My inner muppet says 50mil plus Berbatov for Sandro and Modric.
I think Fergie could make Sandro into a top player.
It would be unwise of Spurs to keep Modric against his will for another year. The player would feel justified in dogging it, and there would be a huge risk of bad feeling poisoning the dressing room.
If he still wants to leave, and they get a decent offer - £30M+ - even Levy will probably let him go.
Well he sure as hell isn't headed to Chelsea or Arsenal. City don't need him, and are we going to stump up?
He's staying at Spurs
he could head to chelsea if they beat Bayern.
As for City not needing him, that wont really stop them. Besides they could just get rid of De jong who wont sign a new contract.
Modric to United will not happen lads. Too expensive an I now feel a little too old.
Move on.
Agreed. If he was 25, maybe we could push the boat out but we won't at his age. No resale value makes the Glazers no happy...
Agreed. If he was 25, maybe we could push the boat out but we won't at his age. No resale value makes the Glazers no happy...
He's 26 not 34.
That's KingMingers's specialty
Any quality player under 25 will sign for City.
Any quality player over 25 will not sign for United, as the "Glazers" won't sign for resale value despite us signing Young last season when he was nearly 26.
The reason why i think he will be sold:
1) Not played as well as last year
2) I think he is now 27, at his peak, and he will know this will be his last chance of moving to a big club
3) If Chelsea win CL, then he is more likely to leave so he can play in UCL.
4) Spurs are not going to win anything
5) If he kicks a fuss again, i can't see Spurs trying to persuade him to stay again, they will accept max £40m.
What has resale value got to do with it? Since when did we start selling our best players at the age of 29 or 30?
Nobody knows what the Glazers views are. Or how much input, if any, they have into who we sign.
Modric is quite possibly the best true CM in the Prem. 30m may be your idea of good money, but I strongly doubt Levy shares the same view.Exactly 30m for Modric is good money, money they could easily spend getting the much needed centre forward they've been crying out for for the last god knows how many years (probably since they sold Keane & Berbatov)
1) Not true
2) He's 26, with several years left staying at peak.
3) IF
4) That's unknowable ... just as it was unknowable that Man. Utd would win nothing this season.
5) Again IF. He got squashed flat last time he kicked up a fuss and he still has 4 years left on his contract. With a lucrative contract increase on offer - and IF we qualify for the CL - his incentive for kicking up a fuss is a lot less now than it was last summer.
I'm not saying that Modric won't be sold this summer, but once again you can bet it will take an eye-watering offer to persuade Levy ... especially if we qualify for CL group stages where the potential earnings are huge and a player like Modric will be key.
Not practical? It's doubtful that Spurs have finished in the top 4 if they'd sold Modric last summer - Levy was smart enough to realise that the profit to be gained from selling Modric was outweighed by the potential earnings from CL football if we could qualify (and we still might).It's not practical to run a football club like that though. If your top players despise you because you lock them into their deals and reject good offers for them then other players, players like Hazard, for example, are going to think twice before joining Tottenham, because they don't want to be the Luca Modric of 2015.
Modric is quite possibly the best true CM in the Prem. 30m may be your idea of good money, but I strongly doubt Levy shares the same view.
Besides Spurs can easily afford to sign a quality striker without selling Modric or any other star player.
That's KingMingers's specialty
Any quality player under 25 will sign for City.
Any quality player over 25 will not sign for United, as the "Glazers" won't sign for resale value despite us signing Young last season when he was nearly 26.
I will be.Got a feeling we will pay 35 mill for this guy as our major summer signing. Fergie is a huge fan and will go for him but don't be surprised if shitty try to gazump us.
We won't sign both him and Kagawa and Kagawa looks like a priority now. Rightly so because between Modric for £30m+ and Kagawa for around £10m the choice is simple.
They don't play the same position though.
Because it's much harder to attract the better players without CL football to offer.Why haven't you then?
Because it's much harder to attract the better players without CL football to offer.
Because it's much harder to attract the better players without CL football to offer.
Exactly! If Kagawa was a central midfielder then happy days but he isn't.
We Still need a player like him, I'm feed up of Rooney trying to be that player. Sticking him up top and make him score 30+ thats what we need from him.
United have briefed the papers several times about their transfer strategy since the Berbatov deal. This strategy was agreed between the Glazers, Gill and Sir Alex. Of course most of the papers ignore the information, linking us to a number of high priced older players which we are forever on the verge of signing but surprisingly, never quite manage to do the deal.
He did that this season playing the role he has done
Modric is quite possibly the best true CM in the Prem. 30m may be your idea of good money, but I strongly doubt Levy shares the same view.
Besides Spurs can easily afford to sign a quality striker without selling Modric or any other star player.
There are good quality strikers out there earning less, or no more, than Spurs would pay them.Except you won't pay a quality strikers wage demands