gbgary
Full Member
You would prefer if he had left it completely for Van Persie to nod in?
take your chances with vds stopping it or vp fecking it up. giving a pen is a sure goal.
You would prefer if he had left it completely for Van Persie to nod in?
But come on now, 4-4-2 is supposedly the way to beat Barcelona and this match is a warm-up.![]()
It's not particularly conclusive after replays either. Almost a kin to batsmen getting the faintest knicks.
Its too big a risk to gamble on the officials not spotting it. Had it been given it would have been a red card and a penalty, deciding the game then and there.
Denying a clear goalscoring opportunity = red.
That vidic incident could have cost us the title
Arse will get weaker as time moves on, we just need to put our (upcoming) chances away.
Denying a clear goalscoring opportunity = red.
That vidic incident could have cost us the title
feck Sky, keep going on about the handball and didn't even bat an eyelid towards Chelsea's "goals" yesterday.
Why would Vidic be lucky to be on the pitch still? It would have been a yellow.
Souness reckons Arsenal have been magnificent?
Typical Arsenal, pass pass pass pass pass nothing - we've had the best chance.
Is a cross in the box considered a clear goalscoring opportunity?
Because I've always understand that term to mean the attacking player had to be in possession of the ball in a goalscoring chance and then is fouled.
Or a blatant handball denying a goal-bound effort.
Carrick and Ando don't help to much
That error from the lino was worse than giving Chelsea the goal yesterday apparently.
Jamie Redknapp, ladies and gentleman.
That phrase gets used on here a lot.That vidic incident could have cost us the title
Yep. The ball changed trajectory and it looked a sitter for van Persie. Should have been a red.
nah it wont.
nah it wont.
That phrase gets used on here a lot.