Berbatov

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah I posted it earlier in the thread, not sure of the totals though. Should be able to get them from OPTA stats.
 
That is a very, very narrow formation and I really can't see Fergie suddenly changing a 20 year old philosphy of playing down the wings. Plus I can't see it working. We shou ldplay our strongest team, not our strongest players. There is no widthe there, Ronaldo cuts inside more often than he plays out wide, Scholes and Carrick certainly can't be expected to cover the wings and it will stifle both Rooney and Tevez as they will be expected to drop back in centre midfield and fill in out wide. In short, I don't see how that will work

That formation needs two swash-buckling full-backs to provide width. We have that on the left, with Evra. The return of Nev will give us much more width on the right.

I have huge respect for Wes but I don't think he ever felt comfortbale in the final third which meant that we did lose width when Ronaldo cut inside. With Nev steaming down the touchline, on over-lapping runs, we will have much more width then we had last season.
 
Lets be honest, Rooney had a bit of a shite season last time around.

If he keeps the same form going this season, then Tevez should be ahead in the pecking order.

If Rooney becomes able to suddenly aim at, and hit a barn door soon, then Rooney should be preferred.

--------DEFENCE---------

Carrick/Hargo---Scholes/Ando

Ronaldo - Rooney - Tevez

----------Berba-------------

The Holy Trinitiy could and would be moving position all the time, and Giggs, Nani and Park would also feature

What I don't get is why do people just try and stick all the 'best' players on the pitch at once? Berba will surely be paired with either Rooney OR Tevez for the majority of the time in a fluid and interchangable 442. When all four are on at once I higly doubt they'd line up like that, as Smashed said too narrow really.
 
What I don't get is why do people just try and stick all the 'best' players on the pitch at once? Berba will surely be paired with either Rooney OR Tevez for the majority of the time in a fluid and interchangable 442. When all four are on at once I higly doubt they'd line up like that, as Smashed said too narrow really.

That's an oxymoron though. 442 is probably the least fluid and interchangeable formations we could use.

442 is dead. Long live 4231!
 
As someone already mentioned, I can remember Tevez being quite frustrating with some of his passing. And often he was found far too deep to be truly effective in his position. Rooney's movement is leagues ahead of Tevez and without Rooney's general play, we'd have struggled a lot. Without Tevez on the pitch we were fine in terms of general play - its the goal threat we missed.
 
That's an oxymoron though. 442 is probably the least fluid and interchangeable formations we could use.

442 is dead. Long live 4231!

Honestly mate it's not. You just have players changing their positions within it, this maintains the width but keeps the defenders guessing as well.

Anyways formations are pretty much bollocks, the way that we play nowdays whether you call it 442 or 4231, when we're taking the piss out of teams you know as well as I do it might as well be called 424
 
That's an oxymoron though. 442 is probably the least fluid and interchangeable formations we could use.

442 is dead. Long live 4231!

With players like Rooney and Ronaldo, even a 442 could be extremely fluid. It just depends who is played next to them. Some of our players are great with tactical change dependant on certain situations. Others arent quite so astute.
 
Honestly mate it's not. You just have players changing their positions within it, this maintains the width but keeps the defenders guessing as well.

Anyways formations are pretty much bollocks, the way that we play nowdays whether you call it 442 or 4231, when we're taking the piss out of teams you know as well as I do it might as well be called 424

Agreed.

But without formations, what's left for us cnuts to bicker about? ;)
 
What happened the last time we were happy to be patient when bidding along with barca? i dont see why these things have to take so long.

On the blower:

Gill - yo spurs we want berbatov, 20m?

Spurs - he wants to go but 20 is too cheap, 30m?

Gill - 30? your having a laugh, come on 23m!

Spurs - uuuuum, ok lets meet in the middle 25 and hes yours.

gill - do you know what sunbeam, youve got a deal! ill let the sun know.

Spurs - sweet, ill tell marca.
 
Ah missed it. I'll have a look, I remember Berbs and Rooney being quite close, but it was early.

Last Two Seasons. All club competitions.

21046.jpg

Rooney 41 goals. 28 assists.

22774.jpg

Ronaldo 65 goals. 28 assists.

12724.jpg

Berbatov 49 goals. 29 assists.
 
Anyways formations are pretty much bollocks, the way that we play nowdays whether you call it 442 or 4231, when we're taking the piss out of teams you know as well as I do it might as well be called 424
I still think it's a useful distinction. In your case 4231 suggests that the CMs will play deep (and Scholes won't get as many goals as he used to) and that the wingers will play narrow (and not go down the flank behind the fullback as often as they used to).
 
I still think it's a useful distinction. In your case 4231 suggests that the CMs will play deep (and Scholes won't get as many goals as he used to) and that the wingers will play narrow (and not go down the flank behind the fullback as often as they used to).

But that's what I'm trying to say, they way you present it is static. There's a massive difference between tactics and formations.

In my view formations are only really useful in picking the team and helping the idiots at Sky and the BBC out. How many times have watched an Arsenal match on the box and they read out the 'formation' adn you've sat their and thought 'there's absolutely no way that's how were playing today' and being right.

4231 suggests nothing really about the width as formations in the mode that we discuss them only stratify the pitch lengthways i'd say tactics and the players available decide the width, tempo, movement etc.
 
SAF has never got it wrong with the big signing though, and i unclude veron it that statement.

is that the opposite of include??

veron was an unmittigated disaster for the club on 2 fronts...1st he didnt fit our playing style and 2nd he broke up the best balanced mid you'll ever see.
 
Rooney 58. Berbatov 63. Not a huge difference.

Not huge no, but enough to bring the stats into perspective when you consider a lot of people consider Rooney to have had a "bad" season last year. I personally dont and I consider Berbatov to have had a good year too.
 
Not huge no, but enough to bring the stats into perspective when you consider a lot of people consider Rooney to have had a "bad" season last year. I personally dont and I consider Berbatov to have had a good year too.

:lol:

Rooney 89. Berbatov 87. Starts in all competitions.

Compare it to the goals and assists. May bring it a little more into perspective.
 
Not huge no, but enough to bring the stats into perspective when you consider a lot of people consider Rooney to have had a "bad" season last year. I personally dont and I consider Berbatov to have had a good year too.

:lol:

Rooney 89. Berbatov 87. Starts in all competitions.

Compare it to the goals and assists. May bring it a little more into perspective.

So Rooney and Berbatov are quite good then.
 
Apparently we've made a £25 mil offer, but i like to talk out of my arse, the sound of it is quite harmonising.
 
Like I said, I'm not sure. We might see Rooney playing on either side of Berbs, as part of a front three. Or we might see Rooney, Ronaldo and Tevez, swapping positions for fun, just behind Berbatov (my personal preference :drool:)

Rooney is clearly being developed into a total footballer, equally at home in any of the positions in the final third and, interestingly enough, some of his best work last season came from out wide (the cross to Wes Brown, which kick-started our annihilation of Liverpool being a good example of this) As you well know (having argued about this a lot last season ;)) I firmly believe that the whole "Rooney should play behind a lead striker, in a 442" theory is a good few years out of date.
The second paragraph is daft, Rooney can move to the flanks playing behind the lead striker in a 442, or he could drop into central midfield, or push right up and try and run onto flick ons, the position gives him more options then any in a 451
 
Status
Not open for further replies.