sullydnl
Ross Kemp's caf ID
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 34,063
Well at least May won something
What was Ramsay Macdonald's deal?
Well at least May won something
Nonsense.
At the time the discussions were about whether or not a free trade deal was possible while rejecting the other principles.
Can someone explain why she originally delayed the vote?
Of course there will be a trade deal at some point, that's not the point. It's the leaving with nothing, it's going to take time to negotiate a trade deal but as it is if the UK leave in March they'll be on WTO terms in April and will be out of all agreements, and the country grinding to a halt which I know you still think is scaremongering.
He’s incompetentThe fact that Corbyn can't win a vote of no confidence in a government this bad, means that he's the one who needs to resign more than May.
The fact that Corbyn can't win a vote of no confidence in a government this bad, means that he's the one who needs to resign more than May.
What was Ramsay Macdonald's deal?
It was over an amendment put forward by the Liberal Party to set up a select committee to investigate a government decision to drop criminal proceedings against the editor of the Communist newspaper Workers Weekly, which had recently published an article encouraging the armed forces to mutiny.What was Ramsay Macdonald's deal?
Year or even decades. Much longer with this shower of clueless shit conducting negotiations.
Seriously, what happens to Euromillions lottery!?
Cameron had 1 or 2 defeats, but i'm struggling to find the one where he lost by 75 in 2014What was Cameron’s defeat?
Of course there will be a trade deal at some point, that's not the point. It's the leaving with nothing, it's going to take time to negotiate a trade deal but as it is if the UK leave in March they'll be on WTO terms in April and will be out of all agreements, and the country grinding to a halt which I know you still think is scaremongering.
I was talking to the other guy about the original scenario of voting to leave the EU and being out of everything, then seeking a trade deal. This never happened.
It took six months for May to explain what her Brexit plan was in Jan 2017 (a bold speech). Then she sought a greater majority in the election to strengthen her position, then after that capitulated to what we have now.
The fact is, no deal has never been an option, and the EU knew the government never had the stomach for it. So we have this almighty clusterfeck. The EU have played this masterfully.
The fact that Corbyn can't win a vote of no confidence in a government this bad, means that he's the one who needs to resign more than May.
They would fight it tooth and nail, but you'd imagine that if May proposed a second referendum she'd have enough support from opposition MPs to win the vote.Vernon Bogdanor, the politics professor and constitutional expert, has told Sky News that he thinks tonight’s vote make a no-deal Brexit more likely than a second referendum. He pointed out that the Commons has already passed legislation saying the UK will be leaving the EU on 29 March. Holding a second referendum would be very difficult, he said, because the government would have to pass legislation, and Brexiters would “fight it tooth and nail”. He went on:
There are about 40 odd sitting days left till March 29. If no other statute is passed, we leave without a deal. I take the view ... that the vote tonight makes a no-deal departure more likely than a second referendum.
Source: Guardian
I was talking to the other guy about the original scenario of voting to leave the EU and being out of everything, then seeking a trade deal. This never happened.
It took six months for May to explain what her Brexit plan was in Jan 2017 (a bold speech). Then she sought a greater majority in the election to strengthen her position, then after that capitulated to what we have now.
The fact is, no deal has never been an option, and the EU knew the government never had the stomach for it. So we have this almighty clusterfeck. The EU have played this masterfully.
The EU have played this masterfully.
The EU didn't play anything, no deal is de facto the primary option. It was the only guarantee, which some of us mentioned, the issue is that british politicians did their best to pretend that it wasn't the case, they thought that german manufacturers and french farmers would put pressure on their respective governments.
The EU sat back and watched as the government became more and more divisive, and quickly saw that we would be the ones grovelling to them for a trade deal. The trade deal became more important than leaving, which set the tone for how the process would play out.
It's like saying to a person who's come to buy your car, " I must sell this car at any price".
The fact that Corbyn can't win a vote of no confidence in a government this bad, means that he's the one who needs to resign more than May.
Syria I think?What was Cameron’s defeat?
The EU sat back and watched as the government became more and more divisive, and quickly saw that we would be the ones grovelling to them for a trade deal. The trade deal became more important than leaving, which set the tone for how the process would play out.
It's like saying to a person who's come to buy your car, " I must sell this car at any price".
I have no idea what's going on with this shitshow.
How likely is it that we just cancel Brexit and stay in the EU?
Interesting. What's the sentiment in the UK regarding a second referendum? Would remain win or margin widen for leave?1 in 4 chance I'd say. The other 3 options being a second referendum, general election or no deal.
It would cause absolute uproar across the country. Then again, so would almost every other avenue. It really is Pandora's box.
The EU sat back and watched as the government became more and more divisive, and quickly saw that we would be the ones grovelling to them for a trade deal. The trade deal became more important than leaving, which set the tone for how the process would play out.
It's like saying to a person who's come to buy your car, " I must sell this car at any price".
Unless you expect the EU to literally govern the UK, they weren't going to decide for the UK. The only issue here is that the UK wants contradictory things because they are totally unable to find a consensus, the EU didn't create that situation it's a british issue and it's the issue that created the referendum and also led to a narrow brexit result. As a nation you don't have a clue about what you want to do with yourself.
For that reason earlier in this thread I suggested that the UK should only trigger art.50 when they are ready but selfish politicians decided to rush it in fear of damaging their personal careers.
One of four options:Can someone fill me in on the details of what this means? I know shit about politics
To be fair to her, it must be exhausting being quite so shit. I don’t think I could manage it personallyI see Mrs May is wearing the Elizabeth I/Margaret Thatcher necklace again; unfortunately, the only fundamental thing she has in common with them is vanity.
The mental gymnastics to blame the EU is impressive.
It's incredible the absolute shitshow this country has been put through by the Tory party in recent years, and yet if there were a general election tomorrow I wouldn't be confident of a Labour win.Complete shitstorm by the Torries.
Cameron should be impaled.
Ah, sorry, misunderstood you there.I'm not blaming the EU in all this, they're simply protecting their own interests.